COLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Extra Space Storage, Inc. has a net margin of -1.73% compared to Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 20.22%. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.95% beat Extra Space Storage, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.76%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 17.4%. On the other hand Extra Space Storage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $149.70 which suggests that it could grow by 5.07%. Given that Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Extra Space Storage, Inc., analysts believe Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Extra Space Storage, Inc..

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Extra Space Storage, Inc. has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.888%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Extra Space Storage, Inc. offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Americold Realty Trust, Inc. pays 266.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Extra Space Storage, Inc. pays out 160.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $663.7M, which are smaller than Extra Space Storage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $858.5M. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$11.4M is lower than Extra Space Storage, Inc.'s net income of $173.6M. Notably, Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Extra Space Storage, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.37x versus 9.13x for Extra Space Storage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Point Holdings LLC has a net margin of -1.73% compared to Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 77.28%. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.95% beat Five Point Holdings LLC's return on equity of 8.04%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 17.4%. On the other hand Five Point Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 126.84%. Given that Five Point Holdings LLC has higher upside potential than Americold Realty Trust, Inc., analysts believe Five Point Holdings LLC is more attractive than Americold Realty Trust, Inc..

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Point Holdings LLC has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.393%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Five Point Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Americold Realty Trust, Inc. pays 266.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Point Holdings LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $663.7M, which are larger than Five Point Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $75.9M. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$11.4M is lower than Five Point Holdings LLC's net income of $58.7M. Notably, Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five Point Holdings LLC's PE ratio is 6.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.37x versus 7.18x for Five Point Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -1.73% compared to Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.95% beat Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.74%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 17.4%. On the other hand Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., analysts believe Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc..

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.596%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Americold Realty Trust, Inc. pays 266.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $663.7M, which are larger than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.8M. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$11.4M is lower than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s net income of $884K. Notably, Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 82.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.37x versus 9.48x for Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ventas, Inc. has a net margin of -1.73% compared to Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 4.66%. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.95% beat Ventas, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.16%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 17.4%. On the other hand Ventas, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $88.70 which suggests that it could grow by 3.51%. Given that Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ventas, Inc., analysts believe Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Ventas, Inc..

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ventas, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.07%.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Ventas, Inc. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Americold Realty Trust, Inc. pays 266.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Ventas, Inc. pays out 353.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $663.7M, which are smaller than Ventas, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$11.4M is lower than Ventas, Inc.'s net income of $73M. Notably, Americold Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ventas, Inc.'s PE ratio is 158.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.37x versus 6.79x for Ventas, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.