ZS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MongoDB has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Zscaler's net margin of 2.89%. Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22% beat MongoDB's return on equity of -8.08%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $236.83, signalling upside risk potential of 1.62%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $262.34 which suggests that it could grow by 46.93%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.947%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $647.9M, which are larger than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $548.4M. Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M is lower than MongoDB's net income of $15.8M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 14.72x versus 6.70x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SentinelOne has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -31.39%. Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $236.83, signalling upside risk potential of 1.62%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 27.03%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $647.9M, which are larger than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $225.5M. Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 14.72x versus 7.35x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -748.63%. Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -197.85%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $236.83, signalling upside risk potential of 1.62%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $12.93 which suggests that it could grow by 43.97%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $647.9M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $34.5M. Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of -$258.6M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 14.72x versus 35.90x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Zscaler's net margin of 8.23%. Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $236.83, signalling upside risk potential of 1.62%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $86.49 which suggests that it could grow by 21.76%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.891%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $647.9M, which are larger than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $616M. Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 86.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 14.72x versus 13.91x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.