HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 43.65%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $779.42, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $443.43 which suggests that it could grow by 75.72%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.4B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $599.2M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,288.44x while AppLovin's PE ratio is 55.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.23x versus 18.64x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fiserv has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 17.86%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $779.42, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $247.47 which suggests that it could grow by 13.99%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Fiserv.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.68%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.3B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $938M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,288.44x while Fiserv's PE ratio is 40.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.23x versus 6.18x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -11.26%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -8.61%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $779.42, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $19.47 which suggests that it could grow by 52.35%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $194.6M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$21.9M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,288.44x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.23x versus 5.34x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 4.84%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $779.42, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 148.34%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $314.7M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,288.44x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.23x versus 2.23x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.