HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 38.84%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 229.75%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $753.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.65%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $455.16 which suggests that it could grow by 30.83%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.5B. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $576.4M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while AppLovin's PE ratio is 62.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.72x versus 23.50x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fiserv has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 16.59%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $753.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.65%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $227.42 which suggests that it could grow by 21.73%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.044%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.1B. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $851M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Fiserv's PE ratio is 33.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.72x versus 5.18x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parsons has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 4.26%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Parsons's return on equity of 16.94%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $753.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.65%. On the other hand Parsons has an analysts' consensus of $80.23 which suggests that it could grow by 23.26%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parsons has a beta of 0.569, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.105%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parsons offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parsons pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are smaller than Parsons quarterly revenues of $1.6B. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Parsons's net income of $66.2M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Parsons's PE ratio is 27.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.72x versus 1.10x for Parsons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -8.17%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $753.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.65%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 79.82%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.72x versus 2.61x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.