S Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

UiPath has a net margin of -31.39% compared to SentinelOne's net margin of 12.23%. SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.9%.

SentinelOne has a consensus price target of $24.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.58%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $12.44 which suggests that it could grow by 14.36%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than UiPath.

SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SentinelOne has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SentinelOne pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SentinelOne quarterly revenues are $225.5M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $423.6M. SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M is lower than UiPath's net income of $51.8M. Notably, SentinelOne's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SentinelOne is 7.10x versus 4.27x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -31.39% compared to SentinelOne's net margin of 9.55%. SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

SentinelOne has a consensus price target of $24.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.58%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.61 which suggests that it could grow by 0.43%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SentinelOne has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SentinelOne pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SentinelOne quarterly revenues are $225.5M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, SentinelOne's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 453.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SentinelOne is 7.10x versus 73.76x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of -31.39% compared to SentinelOne's net margin of 24.59%. SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 15.96%.

SentinelOne has a consensus price target of $24.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.58%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $111.81 which suggests that it could grow by 107.28%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than SentinelOne, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than SentinelOne.

SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.516%.

SentinelOne has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SentinelOne pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SentinelOne quarterly revenues are $225.5M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $741M. SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $182.2M. Notably, SentinelOne's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 69.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SentinelOne is 7.10x versus 11.07x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of -31.39% compared to SentinelOne's net margin of -1.19%. SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22%.

SentinelOne has a consensus price target of $24.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.58%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $235.74 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Zscaler.

SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.779%.

SentinelOne has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SentinelOne pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SentinelOne quarterly revenues are $225.5M, which are smaller than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $647.9M. SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M is lower than Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, SentinelOne's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SentinelOne is 7.10x versus 12.49x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.