VRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -19.86% compared to Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s return on equity of -50.27% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.12%. Given that Vera Bradley, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., analysts believe Vera Bradley, Inc. is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc..

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.685%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Vera Bradley, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vera Bradley, Inc. quarterly revenues are $62.3M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley, Inc. is 0.30x versus 0.43x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -19.86% compared to Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s return on equity of -50.27% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 157.73%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Vera Bradley, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Vera Bradley, Inc..

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.306%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley, Inc. quarterly revenues are $62.3M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley, Inc. is 0.30x versus 79.37x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a net margin of -19.86% compared to Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net margin of -0.69%. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s return on equity of -50.27% beat Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand Lifetime Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.14%. Given that Lifetime Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Vera Bradley, Inc., analysts believe Lifetime Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Vera Bradley, Inc..

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.77%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifetime Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Vera Bradley, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays out 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vera Bradley, Inc. quarterly revenues are $62.3M, which are smaller than Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $171.9M. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4M is lower than Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley, Inc. is 0.30x versus 0.13x for Lifetime Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann Corp. has a net margin of -19.86% compared to Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net margin of -248.19%. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s return on equity of -50.27% beat Northann Corp.'s return on equity of -204.71%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.29%. On the other hand Northann Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vera Bradley, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northann Corp., analysts believe Vera Bradley, Inc. is more attractive than Northann Corp..

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley, Inc. quarterly revenues are $62.3M, which are larger than Northann Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4M is lower than Northann Corp.'s net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Northann Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley, Inc. is 0.30x versus 0.19x for Northann Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.