VIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Viomi Technology's net margin of 3.35%. Viomi Technology's return on equity of -1.74% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Viomi Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 167.86%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that Viomi Technology has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Viomi Technology is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Viomi Technology has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.

Viomi Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Viomi Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viomi Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Viomi Technology's net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Viomi Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viomi Technology is 0.31x versus 0.20x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Viomi Technology's net margin of -80.8%. Viomi Technology's return on equity of -1.74% beat Lotus Technology's return on equity of --.

Viomi Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 167.86%. On the other hand Lotus Technology has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that Viomi Technology has higher upside potential than Lotus Technology, analysts believe Viomi Technology is more attractive than Lotus Technology.

Viomi Technology has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Viomi Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lotus Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viomi Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lotus Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viomi Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lotus Technology quarterly revenues of $254.7M. Viomi Technology's net income of -- is lower than Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M. Notably, Viomi Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lotus Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viomi Technology is 0.31x versus 2.32x for Lotus Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ATRenew has a net margin of -- compared to Viomi Technology's net margin of 0.44%. Viomi Technology's return on equity of -1.74% beat ATRenew's return on equity of -2.25%.

Viomi Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 167.86%. On the other hand ATRenew has an analysts' consensus of $3.15 which suggests that it could grow by 12.05%. Given that Viomi Technology has higher upside potential than ATRenew, analysts believe Viomi Technology is more attractive than ATRenew.

Viomi Technology has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATRenew has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Viomi Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ATRenew offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viomi Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ATRenew pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viomi Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ATRenew quarterly revenues of $565.8M. Viomi Technology's net income of -- is lower than ATRenew's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Viomi Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ATRenew's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viomi Technology is 0.31x versus 0.33x for ATRenew. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of -- compared to Viomi Technology's net margin of 42.62%. Viomi Technology's return on equity of -1.74% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Viomi Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 167.86%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.13 which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Viomi Technology has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Viomi Technology is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Viomi Technology has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.53%.

Viomi Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viomi Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viomi Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Viomi Technology's net income of -- is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Viomi Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 21.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viomi Technology is 0.31x versus 6.93x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.