LOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of 6.56%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat Li Auto's return on equity of 16.5%.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $29.96 which suggests that it could grow by 27.14%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than Li Auto.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $393.1M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 2.32x versus 1.27x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -27.53%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 39.31%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Lotus Technology, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Lotus Technology.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.919%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 2.32x versus 1.02x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -17.9%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.41%.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $14.36 which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than XPeng.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$252.5M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 2.32x versus 2.24x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -6.68%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $34.69 which suggests that it could grow by 25.9%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is lower than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$171.3M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 2.32x versus 0.70x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.