UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 10.49% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 23.07%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.79% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 40.9%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling downside risk potential of -3.15%. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $240.05 which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that The Allstate Corp. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe The Allstate Corp. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.464, which suggesting that the stock is 53.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.235, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.46%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 14.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are smaller than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.6B. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.8B. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.73x versus 0.82x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a net margin of 10.49% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 21.91%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.79% beat Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 16.33%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling downside risk potential of -3.15%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $174.60 which suggests that it could grow by 6.82%. Given that Cincinnati Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe Cincinnati Financial Corp. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.464, which suggesting that the stock is 53.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.342%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Cincinnati Financial Corp. offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 14.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial Corp. pays out 22.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is lower than Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s net income of $676M. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.73x versus 2.04x for Cincinnati Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.49% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 31.38%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.79% beat HCI Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.65%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling downside risk potential of -3.15%. On the other hand HCI Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $245.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48.69%. Given that HCI Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe HCI Group, Inc. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.464, which suggesting that the stock is 53.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.382%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. HCI Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 14.29% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group, Inc. pays out 18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are larger than HCI Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $216.4M. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is lower than HCI Group, Inc.'s net income of $67.9M. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while HCI Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.73x versus 2.48x for HCI Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 10.49% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 9.93%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.79% beat Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.48%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling downside risk potential of -3.15%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.26%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.464, which suggesting that the stock is 53.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.587%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 14.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays out 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $401M. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is lower than Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $39.8M. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.73x versus 0.58x for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.