UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a net margin of 11.07% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 30.11%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.47% beat Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 14.91%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 4.63%. Given that Cincinnati Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe Cincinnati Financial Corp. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.09%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Cincinnati Financial Corp. offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 26.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial Corp. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $354M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is lower than Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.71x versus 2.15x for Cincinnati Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donegal Group, Inc. has a net margin of 11.07% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 8.17%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.47% beat Donegal Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.97%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Donegal Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.76%. Given that Donegal Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe Donegal Group, Inc. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donegal Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.043, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.746%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Donegal Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 26.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Donegal Group, Inc. pays out 45.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $354M, which are larger than Donegal Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $245.9M. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than Donegal Group, Inc.'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Donegal Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.73x for Donegal Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group, Inc. has a net margin of 11.07% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 31.38%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.47% beat HCI Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.65%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand HCI Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $234.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.42%. Given that HCI Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe HCI Group, Inc. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.811%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. HCI Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 26.77% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group, Inc. pays out 18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $354M, which are larger than HCI Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $216.4M. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is lower than HCI Group, Inc.'s net income of $67.9M. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while HCI Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.71x versus 2.74x for HCI Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 11.07% compared to United Fire Group, Inc.'s net margin of 9.93%. United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.47% beat Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.48%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.84%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.381%.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. United Fire Group, Inc. pays 26.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays out 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $354M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $401M. United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is lower than Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $39.8M. Notably, United Fire Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.60x for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.