UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 1.6%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $167.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.18%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than HCI Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, which suggesting that the stock is 51.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.542%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is higher than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.01x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 17.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 2.51x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 2.86%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.31%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, which suggesting that the stock is 51.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.01x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 1.04x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 8.55%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.17 which suggests that it could grow by 4.85%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, which suggesting that the stock is 51.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.059%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.01x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 1.10x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 10.49%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.68%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.04%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, which suggesting that the stock is 51.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.082%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $394.9M. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is lower than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.01x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 11.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 0.47x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.