UVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 23.73%. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.48% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.38%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.17%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc..

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.716%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $401M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $212.5M. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $39.8M is lower than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $50.4M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.19x while Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is 0.56x versus 0.96x for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Republic International Corp. has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.67%. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.48% beat Old Republic International Corp.'s return on equity of 15.62%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand Old Republic International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $42.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.5%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Old Republic International Corp., analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Old Republic International Corp..

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Republic International Corp. has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.074%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Old Republic International Corp. offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.50 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Republic International Corp. pays out 31.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $401M, which are smaller than Old Republic International Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $39.8M is lower than Old Republic International Corp.'s net income of $207.1M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.19x while Old Republic International Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.08x for Old Republic International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive Corp. has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.98%. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.48% beat Progressive Corp.'s return on equity of 35.77%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand Progressive Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $245.9800 which suggests that it could grow by 18.26%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Progressive Corp., analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Progressive Corp..

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive Corp. has a beta of 0.343, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.692%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Progressive Corp. offers a yield of 6.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $13.60 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive Corp. pays out 72.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $401M, which are smaller than Progressive Corp. quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $39.8M is lower than Progressive Corp.'s net income of $3B. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.19x while Progressive Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.40x for Progressive Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 11.07%. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.48% beat United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.47%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand United Fire Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.34%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, Inc., analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Fire Group, Inc..

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.446, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.407%.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. United Fire Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group, Inc. pays out 26.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $401M, which are larger than United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $354M. Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $39.8M is higher than United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.19x while United Fire Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. is 0.56x versus 0.70x for United Fire Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.