TUSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -81.47% compared to Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -5.78%. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.81% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 224.32%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 420.83%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mammoth Energy Services, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Mammoth Energy Services, Inc..

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.954%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.8M, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$12.1M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is 0.61x versus 0.15x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -81.47% compared to Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -8.62%. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.81% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 224.32%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.15%. Given that Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.406%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.8M, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $318.8M. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$12.1M is higher than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M. Notably, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is 0.61x versus 0.54x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -81.47% compared to Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -443.46%. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.81% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 224.32%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.432%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.8M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$12.1M is lower than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is 0.61x versus 3.81x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of -81.47% compared to Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of 4.33%. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.81% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 224.32%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.446%.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.8M, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$12.1M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is 0.61x versus 0.44x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.