TRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Woodmark has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of 4.17%. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.05%.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.22%. On the other hand American Woodmark has an analysts' consensus of $76.33 which suggests that it could grow by 30.22%. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than American Woodmark, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than American Woodmark.

TriMas has a beta of 0.579, which suggesting that the stock is 42.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Woodmark has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.841%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. American Woodmark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. American Woodmark pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are smaller than American Woodmark quarterly revenues of $397.6M. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is lower than American Woodmark's net income of $16.6M. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while American Woodmark's PE ratio is 9.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.06x versus 0.52x for American Woodmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of 2.26%. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.22%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.83%. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

TriMas has a beta of 0.579, which suggesting that the stock is 42.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.912%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.06x versus 0.47x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of --. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.22%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.7%. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

TriMas has a beta of 0.579, which suggesting that the stock is 42.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.06x versus 147.34x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 5.14% compared to TriMas's net margin of --. TriMas's return on equity of 4.66% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

TriMas has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.22%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TriMas has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe TriMas is more attractive than Northann.

TriMas has a beta of 0.579, which suggesting that the stock is 42.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TriMas has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TriMas pays 27.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriMas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TriMas quarterly revenues are $241.7M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. TriMas's net income of $12.4M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, TriMas's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TriMas is 1.06x versus 0.72x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.