TRMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ESCO Technologies has a net margin of 7.94% compared to Trimble's net margin of 11.69%. Trimble's return on equity of 28.01% beat ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.65%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $83.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand ESCO Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could fall by -1.79%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.

Trimble has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.047%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ESCO Technologies offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies pays out 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $840.6M, which are larger than ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues of $265.5M. Trimble's net income of $66.7M is higher than ESCO Technologies's net income of $31M. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while ESCO Technologies's PE ratio is 38.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.71x versus 4.24x for ESCO Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 7.94% compared to Trimble's net margin of 1.09%. Trimble's return on equity of 28.01% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $83.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.99%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Trimble has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.713%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $840.6M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.9M. Trimble's net income of $66.7M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of $906K. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.71x versus 2.40x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 7.94% compared to Trimble's net margin of --. Trimble's return on equity of 28.01% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $83.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $840.6M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Trimble's net income of $66.7M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.71x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 7.94% compared to Trimble's net margin of 11.08%. Trimble's return on equity of 28.01% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $83.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.72%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.223, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.711%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $840.6M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Trimble's net income of $66.7M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 82.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.71x versus 15.26x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.