TRMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ainos, Inc. has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Trimble, Inc.'s net margin of -133259.09%. Trimble, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.27% beat Ainos, Inc.'s return on equity of -109.74%.

Trimble, Inc. has a consensus price target of $98.45, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand Ainos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trimble, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ainos, Inc., analysts believe Trimble, Inc. is more attractive than Ainos, Inc..

Trimble, Inc. has a beta of 1.598, which suggesting that the stock is 59.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ainos, Inc. has a beta of 2.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.689%.

Trimble, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ainos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ainos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble, Inc. quarterly revenues are $901.2M, which are larger than Ainos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2K. Trimble, Inc.'s net income of $111.5M is higher than Ainos, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Trimble, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.00x while Ainos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble, Inc. is 5.57x versus 220.86x for Ainos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ESCO Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Trimble, Inc.'s net margin of 12.72%. Trimble, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.27% beat ESCO Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.38%.

Trimble, Inc. has a consensus price target of $98.45, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand ESCO Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $255.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.77%. Given that ESCO Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trimble, Inc., analysts believe ESCO Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Trimble, Inc..

Trimble, Inc. has a beta of 1.598, which suggesting that the stock is 59.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESCO Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.828%.

Trimble, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ESCO Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Trimble, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies, Inc. pays out 6.55% of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trimble, Inc. quarterly revenues are $901.2M, which are larger than ESCO Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $352.7M. Trimble, Inc.'s net income of $111.5M is higher than ESCO Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $44.9M. Notably, Trimble, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.00x while ESCO Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble, Inc. is 5.57x versus 4.48x for ESCO Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group, Inc. has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Trimble, Inc.'s net margin of -9.17%. Trimble, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.27% beat LGL Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.4%.

Trimble, Inc. has a consensus price target of $98.45, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand LGL Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.82%. Given that LGL Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trimble, Inc., analysts believe LGL Group, Inc. is more attractive than Trimble, Inc..

Trimble, Inc. has a beta of 1.598, which suggesting that the stock is 59.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.348%.

Trimble, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble, Inc. quarterly revenues are $901.2M, which are larger than LGL Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $661K. Trimble, Inc.'s net income of $111.5M is higher than LGL Group, Inc.'s net income of $794K. Notably, Trimble, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.00x while LGL Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble, Inc. is 5.57x versus 13.89x for LGL Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Biotec has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Trimble, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trimble, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.27% beat US Biotec's return on equity of --.

Trimble, Inc. has a consensus price target of $98.45, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand US Biotec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trimble, Inc. has higher upside potential than US Biotec, analysts believe Trimble, Inc. is more attractive than US Biotec.

Trimble, Inc. has a beta of 1.598, which suggesting that the stock is 59.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Biotec has a beta of 1,683.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168257.737%.

Trimble, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Biotec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Biotec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble, Inc. quarterly revenues are $901.2M, which are larger than US Biotec quarterly revenues of --. Trimble, Inc.'s net income of $111.5M is higher than US Biotec's net income of --. Notably, Trimble, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.00x while US Biotec's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble, Inc. is 5.57x versus -- for US Biotec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.