COHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Know Labs has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Coherent's net margin of --. Coherent's return on equity of -0.85% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $112.03, signalling upside risk potential of 12.28%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 532.91%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.446%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Coherent's net income of $25.9M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 3.05x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.08%. Coherent's return on equity of -0.85% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $112.03, signalling upside risk potential of 12.28%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.45%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.4%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Coherent's net income of $25.9M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 110.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 3.05x versus 16.19x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luna Innovations has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Coherent's net margin of --. Coherent's return on equity of -0.85% beat Luna Innovations's return on equity of --.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $112.03, signalling upside risk potential of 12.28%. On the other hand Luna Innovations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 424.69%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.716%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luna Innovations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luna Innovations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Luna Innovations quarterly revenues of --. Coherent's net income of $25.9M is higher than Luna Innovations's net income of --. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luna Innovations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 3.05x versus 0.47x for Luna Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Coherent's net margin of 4.64%. Coherent's return on equity of -0.85% beat Trimble's return on equity of 4.79%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $112.03, signalling upside risk potential of 12.28%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $86.27 which suggests that it could grow by 20.04%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.609%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Trimble quarterly revenues of $875.8M. Coherent's net income of $25.9M is lower than Trimble's net income of $40.6M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trimble's PE ratio is 80.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 3.05x versus 4.75x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.