COHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of -15.14%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.28%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $85.44 which suggests that it could grow by 28.98%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Coherent has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.677%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 2.03x versus 3.19x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.02%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.28%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 83.56%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 2.03x versus 8.45x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 56.17%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.28%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $163.12 which suggests that it could grow by 39.35%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 2.03x versus 22.25x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 2.37%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.28%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $43.67 which suggests that it could grow by 34.44%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Coherent has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.362, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.193%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 2.03x versus 0.96x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.