TER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 19.75% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 9.48%. Teradyne's return on equity of 19.5% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 3.19%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.264%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 15.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $737.3M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Teradyne's net income of $145.6M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of $238K. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.26x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 39.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 7.74x versus 1.92x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 19.75% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 16.78%. Teradyne's return on equity of 19.5% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.069%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Teradyne pays 15.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $737.3M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Teradyne's net income of $145.6M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.26x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 24.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 7.74x versus 3.12x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 19.75% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 12.67%. Teradyne's return on equity of 19.5% beat Itron's return on equity of 17.07%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $127.62 which suggests that it could grow by 15.54%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.663%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 15.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $737.3M, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $615.5M. Teradyne's net income of $145.6M is higher than Itron's net income of $78M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.26x while Itron's PE ratio is 22.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 7.74x versus 2.12x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS Instruments has a net margin of 19.75% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 6.92%. Teradyne's return on equity of 19.5% beat MKS Instruments's return on equity of 1.29%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand MKS Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.56%. Given that MKS Instruments has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe MKS Instruments is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.318%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. MKS Instruments offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Teradyne pays 15.13% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS Instruments pays out -3.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $737.3M, which are smaller than MKS Instruments quarterly revenues of $896M. Teradyne's net income of $145.6M is higher than MKS Instruments's net income of $62M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.26x while MKS Instruments's PE ratio is 238.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 7.74x versus 2.04x for MKS Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.