TER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom Inc. has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Teradyne, Inc.'s net margin of 47.28%. Teradyne, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.74% beat Broadcom Inc.'s return on equity of 31.98%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a consensus price target of $201.88, signalling downside risk potential of -6.67%. On the other hand Broadcom Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $457.03 which suggests that it could grow by 32.49%. Given that Broadcom Inc. has higher upside potential than Teradyne, Inc., analysts believe Broadcom Inc. is more attractive than Teradyne, Inc..

Teradyne, Inc. has a beta of 1.836, which suggesting that the stock is 83.605% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.768%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Broadcom Inc. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Teradyne, Inc. pays 14.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc. pays out 49.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne, Inc. quarterly revenues are $769.2M, which are smaller than Broadcom Inc. quarterly revenues of $18B. Teradyne, Inc.'s net income of $119.6M is lower than Broadcom Inc.'s net income of $8.5B. Notably, Teradyne, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 78.73x while Broadcom Inc.'s PE ratio is 72.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne, Inc. is 12.19x versus 26.20x for Broadcom Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA Corp. has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Teradyne, Inc.'s net margin of 34.93%. Teradyne, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.74% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 101.72%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a consensus price target of $201.88, signalling downside risk potential of -6.67%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,320.96 which suggests that it could fall by -0.28%. Given that Teradyne, Inc. has more downside risk than KLA Corp., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than Teradyne, Inc..

Teradyne, Inc. has a beta of 1.836, which suggesting that the stock is 83.605% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.735%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Teradyne, Inc. pays 14.45% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne, Inc. quarterly revenues are $769.2M, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Teradyne, Inc.'s net income of $119.6M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Teradyne, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 78.73x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne, Inc. is 12.19x versus 14.08x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS, Inc. has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Teradyne, Inc.'s net margin of 7.49%. Teradyne, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.74% beat MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a consensus price target of $201.88, signalling downside risk potential of -6.67%. On the other hand MKS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $180.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.09%. Given that MKS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Teradyne, Inc., analysts believe MKS, Inc. is more attractive than Teradyne, Inc..

Teradyne, Inc. has a beta of 1.836, which suggesting that the stock is 83.605% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.228%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. MKS, Inc. offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Teradyne, Inc. pays 14.45% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS, Inc. pays out 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne, Inc. quarterly revenues are $769.2M, which are smaller than MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $988M. Teradyne, Inc.'s net income of $119.6M is higher than MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M. Notably, Teradyne, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 78.73x while MKS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne, Inc. is 12.19x versus 3.16x for MKS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Teradyne, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Teradyne, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.74% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a consensus price target of $201.88, signalling downside risk potential of -6.67%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $252.28 which suggests that it could grow by 36.34%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Teradyne, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Teradyne, Inc..

Teradyne, Inc. has a beta of 1.836, which suggesting that the stock is 83.605% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

Teradyne, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Teradyne, Inc. pays 14.45% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne, Inc. quarterly revenues are $769.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Teradyne, Inc.'s net income of $119.6M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Teradyne, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 78.73x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 45.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne, Inc. is 12.19x versus 24.31x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.