MKSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KLA Corp. has a net margin of 7.49% compared to MKS, Inc.'s net margin of 34.75%. MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 100.25%.

MKS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $232.15, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,577.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.44%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than MKS, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than MKS, Inc..

MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.922, which suggesting that the stock is 92.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.735%.

MKS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. MKS, Inc. pays 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $988M, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, MKS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.25x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS, Inc. is 4.15x versus 14.86x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research Corp. has a net margin of 7.49% compared to MKS, Inc.'s net margin of 29.82%. MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37% beat Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 64.03%.

MKS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $232.15, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand Lam Research Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $257.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.14%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than MKS, Inc., analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than MKS, Inc..

MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.922, which suggesting that the stock is 92.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.372%.

MKS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Lam Research Corp. offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. MKS, Inc. pays 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp. pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $988M, which are smaller than Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.3B. MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M is lower than Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, MKS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.25x while Lam Research Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS, Inc. is 4.15x versus 14.47x for Lam Research Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 7.49% compared to MKS, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

MKS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $232.15, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.19 which suggests that it could grow by 32.47%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than MKS, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than MKS, Inc..

MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.922, which suggesting that the stock is 92.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

MKS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. MKS, Inc. pays 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $988M, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, MKS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.25x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS, Inc. is 4.15x versus 25.11x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teradyne, Inc. has a net margin of 7.49% compared to MKS, Inc.'s net margin of 15.54%. MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37% beat Teradyne, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.74%.

MKS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $232.15, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand Teradyne, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $220.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.73%. Given that Teradyne, Inc. has more downside risk than MKS, Inc., analysts believe MKS, Inc. is more attractive than Teradyne, Inc..

MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.922, which suggesting that the stock is 92.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teradyne, Inc. has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.605%.

MKS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Teradyne, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. MKS, Inc. pays 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne, Inc. pays out 14.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $988M, which are larger than Teradyne, Inc. quarterly revenues of $769.2M. MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M is lower than Teradyne, Inc.'s net income of $119.6M. Notably, MKS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.25x while Teradyne, Inc.'s PE ratio is 87.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MKS, Inc. is 4.15x versus 13.59x for Teradyne, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.