SNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of 42.39%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4% beat Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -85.33%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.75 which suggests that it could grow by 156.7%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $64.5M. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M is lower than Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of $27.3M. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.17x while Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.42x versus 1.76x for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CoreCivic has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of 4.29%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4% beat CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.21%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CoreCivic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.89%. Given that CoreCivic has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe CoreCivic is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreCivic has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.273%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreCivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic pays out 0.19% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than CoreCivic quarterly revenues of $491.6M. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M is lower than CoreCivic's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.17x while CoreCivic's PE ratio is 31.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.42x versus 1.19x for CoreCivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of 1.16%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.24%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.83%. Given that Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.015%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $275.9M. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.17x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 258.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.42x versus 3.34x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Senstar Technologies's net margin of -658%. Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Senstar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Senstar Technologies has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Senstar Technologies is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.346% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.116, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.413%.

Senstar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Senstar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -162.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$316K. Notably, Senstar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.17x while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senstar Technologies is 2.42x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.