BAER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 50.85% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.5%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.25%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 84.86%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $117.63 which suggests that it could grow by 22.33%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc..

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.961%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.9M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $347.6M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.5M is higher than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 783.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is 1.38x versus 12.00x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 50.85% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -5.56%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.25%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 84.86%. On the other hand Mercury Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.88 which suggests that it could fall by -3.21%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, Inc., analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury Systems, Inc..

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.891%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.9M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225.2M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.5M is higher than Mercury Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is 1.38x versus 5.94x for Mercury Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies, has a net margin of 50.85% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -242%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Network-1 Technologies,'s return on equity of -5.86%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 84.86%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies,, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies,.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies, has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.858%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies, offers a yield of 7.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies, pays out 77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies,'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.9M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies, quarterly revenues of --. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.5M is higher than Network-1 Technologies,'s net income of -$560K. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is 1.38x versus 198.69x for Network-1 Technologies,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Senstar Technologies Corp. has a net margin of 50.85% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.06%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Senstar Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of 11.81%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 84.86%. On the other hand Senstar Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies Corp., analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Senstar Technologies Corp..

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.683%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senstar Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.9M, which are larger than Senstar Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.5M is higher than Senstar Technologies Corp.'s net income of $1M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Senstar Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is 1.38x versus 2.71x for Senstar Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.