BAER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 42.39% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 1.16%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -85.33% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.24%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 156.7%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.83%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.015%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $275.9M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of $27.3M is higher than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 258.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.76x versus 3.34x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of 42.39% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -8.57%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -85.33% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 156.7%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.73%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.517%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $204.4M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of $27.3M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.76x versus 2.68x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 42.39% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -658%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -85.33% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 156.7%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.116, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.413%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -162.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of $27.3M is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$316K. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.76x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Senstar Technologies has a net margin of 42.39% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 13.25%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -85.33% beat Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 156.7%. On the other hand Senstar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.346%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senstar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are larger than Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of $27.3M is higher than Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Senstar Technologies's PE ratio is 51.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 1.76x versus 2.42x for Senstar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.