PKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LGL Systems Acquisition has a net margin of 17.02% compared to Park Aerospace Corp.'s net margin of --. Park Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 8.16% beat LGL Systems Acquisition's return on equity of --.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.31%. On the other hand LGL Systems Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace Corp. has higher upside potential than LGL Systems Acquisition, analysts believe Park Aerospace Corp. is more attractive than LGL Systems Acquisition.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Systems Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. LGL Systems Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace Corp. pays 171.64% of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Systems Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues are $17.3M, which are larger than LGL Systems Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Park Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $3M is higher than LGL Systems Acquisition's net income of --. Notably, Park Aerospace Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.14x while LGL Systems Acquisition's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace Corp. is 8.69x versus -- for LGL Systems Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 17.02% compared to Park Aerospace Corp.'s net margin of 1.71%. Park Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 8.16% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.27%.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.31%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $117.95 which suggests that it could grow by 32.6%. Given that Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park Aerospace Corp., analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Park Aerospace Corp..

Park Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.157%.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace Corp. pays 171.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues are $17.3M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $345.1M. Park Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $3M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Park Aerospace Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.14x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 675.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace Corp. is 8.69x versus 10.89x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 17.02% compared to Park Aerospace Corp.'s net margin of -6.48%. Park Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 8.16% beat Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.08%.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.31%. On the other hand Mercury Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $97.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.02%. Given that Mercury Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park Aerospace Corp., analysts believe Mercury Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Park Aerospace Corp..

Park Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.619%.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Mercury Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace Corp. pays 171.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues are $17.3M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.9M. Park Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $3M is higher than Mercury Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$15.1M. Notably, Park Aerospace Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.14x while Mercury Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace Corp. is 8.69x versus 5.62x for Mercury Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.