CXW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of 2.5%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.39% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.25%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.88, signalling upside risk potential of 47.17%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.67 which suggests that it could fall by -7.07%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.085%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $347.6M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.26x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 926.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 1.06x versus 14.19x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of -5.56%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.39% beat Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.25%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.88, signalling upside risk potential of 47.17%. On the other hand Mercury Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.25 which suggests that it could fall by -7.73%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, Inc., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury Systems, Inc..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.711%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Mercury Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225.2M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Mercury Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.26x while Mercury Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 1.06x versus 5.91x for Mercury Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies, has a net margin of 4.53% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of -242%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.39% beat Network-1 Technologies,'s return on equity of -5.86%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.88, signalling upside risk potential of 47.17%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies,, analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies,.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies, has a beta of 0.158, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.168%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies, offers a yield of 7.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies, pays out 77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies,'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies, quarterly revenues of --. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Network-1 Technologies,'s net income of -$560K. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.26x while Network-1 Technologies,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 1.06x versus 198.69x for Network-1 Technologies,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding Co. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of 11.72%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.39% beat Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.88, signalling upside risk potential of 47.17%. On the other hand Outdoor Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of $2.38 which suggests that it could grow by 29.78%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Outdoor Holding Co., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Outdoor Holding Co..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.729%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Outdoor Holding Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co. pays out 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $12M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.26x while Outdoor Holding Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 1.06x versus 3.30x for Outdoor Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.