CXW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BWX Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 4.39% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of 9.49%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96% beat BWX Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.12%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 85.07%. On the other hand BWX Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $224.44 which suggests that it could grow by 13.14%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than BWX Technologies, Inc., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than BWX Technologies, Inc..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BWX Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.363%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BWX Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BWX Technologies, Inc. pays out 31.28% of its earnings as a dividend. BWX Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $604M, which are smaller than BWX Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $866.4M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is lower than BWX Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $82.2M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while BWX Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 0.79x versus 5.95x for BWX Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 4.39% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of 2.5%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.25%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 85.07%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $115.70 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.961%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $604M, which are larger than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $347.6M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is higher than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 768.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 0.79x versus 11.77x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 4.39% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of -6.48%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96% beat Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.08%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 85.07%. On the other hand Mercury Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $97.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, Inc., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury Systems, Inc..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.891%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $604M, which are larger than Mercury Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.9M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is higher than Mercury Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$15.1M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Mercury Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 0.79x versus 5.40x for Mercury Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a net margin of 4.39% compared to CoreCivic, Inc.'s net margin of 17.02%. CoreCivic, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96% beat Park Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 8.16%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 85.07%. On the other hand Park Aerospace Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.97%. Given that CoreCivic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park Aerospace Corp., analysts believe CoreCivic, Inc. is more attractive than Park Aerospace Corp..

CoreCivic, Inc. has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.207%.

CoreCivic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Aerospace Corp. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. CoreCivic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace Corp. pays out 171.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

CoreCivic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $604M, which are larger than Park Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3M. CoreCivic, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is higher than Park Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $3M. Notably, CoreCivic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Park Aerospace Corp.'s PE ratio is 59.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic, Inc. is 0.79x versus 7.80x for Park Aerospace Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.