NTIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -242% compared to Network-1 Technologies,'s net margin of 1.71%. Network-1 Technologies,'s return on equity of -5.78% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.27%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $118.35 which suggests that it could grow by 75.83%. Given that Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies,, analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies,.

Network-1 Technologies, has a beta of 0.132, which suggesting that the stock is 86.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.642%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Network-1 Technologies, pays 77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies,'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Network-1 Technologies, quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $345.1M. Network-1 Technologies,'s net income of -$1M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Network-1 Technologies,'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 508.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Network-1 Technologies, is 225.50x versus 8.20x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -242% compared to Network-1 Technologies,'s net margin of -6.48%. Network-1 Technologies,'s return on equity of -5.78% beat Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.08%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mercury Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $97.50 which suggests that it could grow by 31.37%. Given that Mercury Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies,, analysts believe Mercury Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies,.

Network-1 Technologies, has a beta of 0.132, which suggesting that the stock is 86.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.264%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Mercury Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Network-1 Technologies, pays 77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies,'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Network-1 Technologies, quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mercury Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.9M. Network-1 Technologies,'s net income of -$1M is higher than Mercury Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$15.1M. Notably, Network-1 Technologies,'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Network-1 Technologies, is 225.50x versus 4.63x for Mercury Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a net margin of -242% compared to Network-1 Technologies,'s net margin of 17.02%. Network-1 Technologies,'s return on equity of -5.78% beat Park Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 8.16%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park Aerospace Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -7.87%. Given that Park Aerospace Corp. has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies,, analysts believe Park Aerospace Corp. is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies,.

Network-1 Technologies, has a beta of 0.132, which suggesting that the stock is 86.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.75%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Park Aerospace Corp. offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Network-1 Technologies, pays 77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace Corp. pays out 171.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies,'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Park Aerospace Corp.'s is not.

Network-1 Technologies, quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3M. Network-1 Technologies,'s net income of -$1M is lower than Park Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $3M. Notably, Network-1 Technologies,'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Aerospace Corp.'s PE ratio is 65.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Network-1 Technologies, is 225.50x versus 8.55x for Park Aerospace Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding Co. has a net margin of -242% compared to Network-1 Technologies,'s net margin of 16.65%. Network-1 Technologies,'s return on equity of -5.78% beat Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -8.57%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Outdoor Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of $2.65 which suggests that it could grow by 28.02%. Given that Outdoor Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies,, analysts believe Outdoor Holding Co. is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies,.

Network-1 Technologies, has a beta of 0.132, which suggesting that the stock is 86.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.572%.

Network-1 Technologies, has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Outdoor Holding Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Network-1 Technologies, pays 77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co. pays out 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Network-1 Technologies, quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $13.4M. Network-1 Technologies,'s net income of -$1M is lower than Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Network-1 Technologies,'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Outdoor Holding Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Network-1 Technologies, is 225.50x versus 5.07x for Outdoor Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.