Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
35
POWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.83
Seasonality move
:
26.5%
Day range:
$1.81 - $1.85
52-week range:
$0.96 - $2.14
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
3.30x
P/B ratio:
0.91x
Volume:
91.5K
Avg. volume:
363.4K
1-year change:
87.15%
Market cap:
$214.3M
Revenue:
$49.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.40
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWW
Outdoor Holding Co.
|
$11.6M | $0.03 | -57.1% | -100% | $2.38 |
|
FLY
Fly Leasing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
|
$52.4M | -$0.05 | -1.97% | -95.15% | $16.67 |
|
MNTS
Momentus, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PL
Planet Labs PBC
|
$72M | -$0.04 | 26.99% | -58.43% | $18.59 |
|
SIDU
Sidus Space, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $10.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWW
Outdoor Holding Co.
|
$1.83 | $2.38 | $214.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.30x |
|
FLY
Fly Leasing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
|
$16.71 | $16.67 | $2B | 10.64x | $0.00 | 0% | 8.41x |
|
MNTS
Momentus, Inc.
|
$7.00 | -- | $12.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.12x |
|
PL
Planet Labs PBC
|
$20.32 | $18.59 | $6.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 21.76x |
|
SIDU
Sidus Space, Inc.
|
$2.20 | $10.00 | $77.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 11.56x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWW
Outdoor Holding Co.
|
4.54% | 0.004 | 6.46% | 3.42x |
|
FLY
Fly Leasing
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
|
-1401.81% | 5.195 | 19.66% | 6.17x |
|
MNTS
Momentus, Inc.
|
117.65% | 1.581 | 28.52% | 0.04x |
|
PL
Planet Labs PBC
|
56.89% | 7.017 | 10.94% | 3.84x |
|
SIDU
Sidus Space, Inc.
|
29.38% | -5.594 | 27.22% | 1.05x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWW
Outdoor Holding Co.
|
$6.9M | $1.2M | -12.14% | -12.79% | 9.67% | $2.5M |
|
FLY
Fly Leasing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$15.4M | -76.73% | -123.2% | -29.41% | -$19M |
|
MNTS
Momentus, Inc.
|
-$115K | -$6.2M | -1285.54% | -4939.96% | -2669.23% | -$5.5M |
|
PL
Planet Labs PBC
|
$46.6M | -$16.9M | -24.18% | -30.33% | -20.85% | $650K |
|
SIDU
Sidus Space, Inc.
|
-$1.3M | -$5.6M | -86.58% | -130.68% | -433.82% | -$7.7M |
Outdoor Holding Co. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns POWW or FLY?
Fly Leasing has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Outdoor Holding Co.'s net margin of --. Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79% beat Fly Leasing's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWWOutdoor Holding Co.57.29% $0.01 $246.6M FLYFly Leasing-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About POWW or FLY?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $2.38, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Fly Leasing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Outdoor Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Fly Leasing, analysts believe Outdoor Holding Co. is more attractive than Fly Leasing.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWWOutdoor Holding Co.1 1 0 FLYFly Leasing0 0 0 -
Is POWW or FLY More Risky?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fly Leasing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWW or FLY?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fly Leasing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding Co. pays 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Fly Leasing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWW or FLY?
Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $12M, which are larger than Fly Leasing quarterly revenues of --. Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Fly Leasing's net income of --. Notably, Outdoor Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fly Leasing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding Co. is 3.30x versus -- for Fly Leasing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWWOutdoor Holding Co.3.30x -- $12M $1.4M FLYFly Leasing-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns POWW or LUNR?
Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Outdoor Holding Co.'s net margin of -18.99%. Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79% beat Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -123.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWWOutdoor Holding Co.57.29% $0.01 $246.6M LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.9.26% -$0.06 $615.1M -
What do Analysts Say About POWW or LUNR?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $2.38, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Intuitive Machines, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.67 which suggests that it could fall by -0.26%. Given that Outdoor Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Outdoor Holding Co. is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWWOutdoor Holding Co.1 1 0 LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.8 0 0 -
Is POWW or LUNR More Risky?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWW or LUNR?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuitive Machines, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding Co. pays 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWW or LUNR?
Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $12M, which are smaller than Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues of $52.4M. Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$10M. Notably, Outdoor Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding Co. is 3.30x versus 8.41x for Intuitive Machines, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWWOutdoor Holding Co.3.30x -- $12M $1.4M LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.8.41x 10.64x $52.4M -$10M
-
Which has Higher Returns POWW or MNTS?
Momentus, Inc. has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Outdoor Holding Co.'s net margin of -4732.48%. Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79% beat Momentus, Inc.'s return on equity of -4939.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWWOutdoor Holding Co.57.29% $0.01 $246.6M MNTSMomentus, Inc.-49.15% -$19.23 $3.9M -
What do Analysts Say About POWW or MNTS?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $2.38, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Momentus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 178399.96%. Given that Momentus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Outdoor Holding Co., analysts believe Momentus, Inc. is more attractive than Outdoor Holding Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWWOutdoor Holding Co.1 1 0 MNTSMomentus, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is POWW or MNTS More Risky?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Momentus, Inc. has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.134%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWW or MNTS?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Momentus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding Co. pays 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Momentus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWW or MNTS?
Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $12M, which are larger than Momentus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $234K. Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Momentus, Inc.'s net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Outdoor Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Momentus, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding Co. is 3.30x versus 8.12x for Momentus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWWOutdoor Holding Co.3.30x -- $12M $1.4M MNTSMomentus, Inc.8.12x -- $234K -$11.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns POWW or PL?
Planet Labs PBC has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Outdoor Holding Co.'s net margin of -72.84%. Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -30.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWWOutdoor Holding Co.57.29% $0.01 $246.6M PLPlanet Labs PBC57.33% -$0.19 $810.9M -
What do Analysts Say About POWW or PL?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $2.38, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Planet Labs PBC has an analysts' consensus of $18.59 which suggests that it could fall by -8.52%. Given that Outdoor Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Outdoor Holding Co. is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWWOutdoor Holding Co.1 1 0 PLPlanet Labs PBC6 3 0 -
Is POWW or PL More Risky?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWW or PL?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Labs PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding Co. pays 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Labs PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWW or PL?
Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $12M, which are smaller than Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues of $81.3M. Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$59.2M. Notably, Outdoor Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Labs PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding Co. is 3.30x versus 21.76x for Planet Labs PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWWOutdoor Holding Co.3.30x -- $12M $1.4M PLPlanet Labs PBC21.76x -- $81.3M -$59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns POWW or SIDU?
Sidus Space, Inc. has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Outdoor Holding Co.'s net margin of -464.8%. Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79% beat Sidus Space, Inc.'s return on equity of -130.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWWOutdoor Holding Co.57.29% $0.01 $246.6M SIDUSidus Space, Inc.-100.07% -$0.24 $34M -
What do Analysts Say About POWW or SIDU?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $2.38, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Sidus Space, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 354.55%. Given that Sidus Space, Inc. has higher upside potential than Outdoor Holding Co., analysts believe Sidus Space, Inc. is more attractive than Outdoor Holding Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWWOutdoor Holding Co.1 1 0 SIDUSidus Space, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is POWW or SIDU More Risky?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWW or SIDU?
Outdoor Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding Co. pays 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWW or SIDU?
Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $12M, which are larger than Sidus Space, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Sidus Space, Inc.'s net income of -$6M. Notably, Outdoor Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sidus Space, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding Co. is 3.30x versus 11.56x for Sidus Space, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWWOutdoor Holding Co.3.30x -- $12M $1.4M SIDUSidus Space, Inc.11.56x -- $1.3M -$6M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
