LUNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Planet Labs PBC has a net margin of -133.2% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of -175.6%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -49.93% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -66.37%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling downside risk potential of -6.21%. On the other hand Planet Labs PBC has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.45%. Given that Intuitive Machines, Inc. has more downside risk than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Planet Labs PBC is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Labs PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Labs PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are smaller than Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues of $86.8M. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$59.7M is higher than Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$152.5M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Planet Labs PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 13.11x versus 41.93x for Planet Labs PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding Co. has a net margin of -133.2% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of 16.65%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -49.93% beat Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -8.57%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling downside risk potential of -6.21%. On the other hand Outdoor Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of $2.65 which suggests that it could grow by 28.02%. Given that Outdoor Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Outdoor Holding Co. is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.572%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Outdoor Holding Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co. pays out 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are larger than Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $13.4M. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$59.7M is lower than Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Outdoor Holding Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 13.11x versus 5.07x for Outdoor Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space, Inc. has a net margin of -133.2% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of -464.8%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -49.93% beat Sidus Space, Inc.'s return on equity of -130.68%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling downside risk potential of -6.21%. On the other hand Sidus Space, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 223.63%. Given that Sidus Space, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Sidus Space, Inc. is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.8M, which are larger than Sidus Space, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$59.7M is lower than Sidus Space, Inc.'s net income of -$6M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Sidus Space, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 13.11x versus 22.43x for Sidus Space, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.