LUNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Momentus, Inc. has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of -4732.48%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -123.2% beat Momentus, Inc.'s return on equity of -4939.96%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling downside risk potential of -10.49%. On the other hand Momentus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89792.07%. Given that Momentus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Momentus, Inc. is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Momentus, Inc. has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.553%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Momentus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Momentus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.4M, which are larger than Momentus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $234K. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$10M is higher than Momentus, Inc.'s net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Momentus, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 9.38x versus 16.12x for Momentus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Labs PBC has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of -72.84%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -123.2% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -30.33%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling downside risk potential of -10.49%. On the other hand Planet Labs PBC has an analysts' consensus of $18.59 which suggests that it could fall by -17.79%. Given that Planet Labs PBC has more downside risk than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Intuitive Machines, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Labs PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Labs PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.4M, which are smaller than Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues of $81.3M. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$10M is higher than Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$59.2M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Planet Labs PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 9.38x versus 24.22x for Planet Labs PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding Co. has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of 11.72%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -123.2% beat Outdoor Holding Co.'s return on equity of -12.79%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling downside risk potential of -10.49%. On the other hand Outdoor Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of $2.38 which suggests that it could grow by 31.94%. Given that Outdoor Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Outdoor Holding Co. is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding Co. has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.729%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Outdoor Holding Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co. pays out 4.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.4M, which are larger than Outdoor Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $12M. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$10M is lower than Outdoor Holding Co.'s net income of $1.4M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Outdoor Holding Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 9.38x versus 3.25x for Outdoor Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space, Inc. has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net margin of -464.8%. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s return on equity of -123.2% beat Sidus Space, Inc.'s return on equity of -130.68%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling downside risk potential of -10.49%. On the other hand Sidus Space, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 115.52%. Given that Sidus Space, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, Inc., analysts believe Sidus Space, Inc. is more attractive than Intuitive Machines, Inc..

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.4M, which are larger than Sidus Space, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s net income of -$10M is lower than Sidus Space, Inc.'s net income of -$6M. Notably, Intuitive Machines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Sidus Space, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines, Inc. is 9.38x versus 24.38x for Sidus Space, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.