RCMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of 3.21% compared to RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -5.78%. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.94% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.33%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 448.59%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than RCM Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than RCM Technologies, Inc..

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a beta of -0.014, which suggesting that the stock is 101.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.954%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RCM Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RCM Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $70.3M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M is higher than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, RCM Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCM Technologies, Inc. is 0.52x versus 0.14x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of 3.21% compared to RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -8.62%. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.94% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.33%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.23%. Given that RCM Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe RCM Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a beta of -0.014, which suggesting that the stock is 101.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.406%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. RCM Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCM Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $70.3M, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $318.8M. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M is higher than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M. Notably, RCM Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCM Technologies, Inc. is 0.52x versus 0.55x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 3.21% compared to RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -443.46%. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.94% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.33%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCM Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe RCM Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a beta of -0.014, which suggesting that the stock is 101.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.432%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RCM Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RCM Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $70.3M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M is higher than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, RCM Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCM Technologies, Inc. is 0.52x versus 4.16x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of 3.21% compared to RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 4.33%. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.94% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.33%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCM Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe RCM Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a beta of -0.014, which suggesting that the stock is 101.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.446%.

RCM Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. RCM Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCM Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $70.3M, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. RCM Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, RCM Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCM Technologies, Inc. is 0.52x versus 0.44x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.