MPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Banking System, Inc. has a net margin of 19.36% compared to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 11.77%. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.21% beat Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.32%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Columbia Banking System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.68%. Given that Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Columbia Banking System, Inc., analysts believe Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is more attractive than Columbia Banking System, Inc..

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Banking System, Inc. has a beta of 0.624, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.596%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Columbia Banking System, Inc. offers a yield of 5.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. pays 27.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Banking System, Inc. pays out 56.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are smaller than Columbia Banking System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $816M. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $18.3M is lower than Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s net income of $96M. Notably, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is 1.94x versus 2.07x for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens & Northern Corp. has a net margin of 19.36% compared to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 15.87%. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.21% beat Citizens & Northern Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Citizens & Northern Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.07%. Given that Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens & Northern Corp., analysts believe Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens & Northern Corp..

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens & Northern Corp. has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.86%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Citizens & Northern Corp. offers a yield of 5.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. pays 27.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern Corp. pays out 66.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are larger than Citizens & Northern Corp. quarterly revenues of $40.9M. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $18.3M is higher than Citizens & Northern Corp.'s net income of $6.5M. Notably, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Citizens & Northern Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is 1.94x versus 1.97x for Citizens & Northern Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) has a net margin of 19.36% compared to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 18.66%. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.21% beat Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s return on equity of 8.84%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio), analysts believe Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is more attractive than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio).

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. pays 27.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) pays out 48.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are smaller than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) quarterly revenues of $156.6M. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $18.3M is lower than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s net income of $29.2M. Notably, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s PE ratio is 10.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is 1.94x versus 1.75x for Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shore Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 19.36% compared to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 16.9%. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.21% beat Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.27%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Shore Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.91%. Given that Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shore Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is more attractive than Shore Bancshares, Inc..

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shore Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.756%.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Shore Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. pays 27.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Shore Bancshares, Inc. pays out 36.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $94.5M, which are larger than Shore Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $84.9M. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $18.3M is higher than Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $14.3M. Notably, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is 1.94x versus 1.77x for Shore Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.