LAKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -33.53% compared to Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.95% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 86.23%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.69%. Given that Lakeland Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., analysts believe Lakeland Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc..

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.187%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Lakeland Industries, Inc. pays 4.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 100.42x while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.46x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -33.53% compared to Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.95% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 86.23%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 151.26%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Lakeland Industries, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Lakeland Industries, Inc..

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeland Industries, Inc. pays 4.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is lower than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 100.42x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 81.41x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has a net margin of -33.53% compared to Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net margin of -21.4%. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.95% beat Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.75%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 86.23%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.3%. Given that Lakeland Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Johnson Outdoors, Inc., analysts believe Lakeland Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Johnson Outdoors, Inc..

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.934%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Johnson Outdoors, Inc. offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Lakeland Industries, Inc. pays 4.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors, Inc. pays out 50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are smaller than Johnson Outdoors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.8M. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is higher than Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s net income of -$29.1M. Notably, Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 100.42x while Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.76x for Johnson Outdoors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann Corp. has a net margin of -33.53% compared to Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net margin of -248.19%. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.95% beat Northann Corp.'s return on equity of -204.71%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 86.23%. On the other hand Northann Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lakeland Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northann Corp., analysts believe Lakeland Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Northann Corp..

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Northann Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeland Industries, Inc. pays 4.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are larger than Northann Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is lower than Northann Corp.'s net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Lakeland Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 100.42x while Northann Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.14x for Northann Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.