JFBR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global E Online has a net margin of -- compared to Jeffs Brands's net margin of 0.57%. Jeffs Brands's return on equity of -73.87% beat Global E Online's return on equity of -8.53%.

Jeffs Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global E Online has an analysts' consensus of $50.23 which suggests that it could grow by 32.77%. Given that Global E Online has higher upside potential than Jeffs Brands, analysts believe Global E Online is more attractive than Jeffs Brands.

Jeffs Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global E Online has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jeffs Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global E Online offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jeffs Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global E Online pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jeffs Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global E Online quarterly revenues of $262.9M. Jeffs Brands's net income of -- is lower than Global E Online's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Jeffs Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global E Online's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jeffs Brands is 0.05x versus 8.41x for Global E Online. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innoviz Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Jeffs Brands's net margin of -308.55%. Jeffs Brands's return on equity of -73.87% beat Innoviz Technologies's return on equity of -83.58%.

Jeffs Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innoviz Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $2.32 which suggests that it could grow by 197.94%. Given that Innoviz Technologies has higher upside potential than Jeffs Brands, analysts believe Innoviz Technologies is more attractive than Jeffs Brands.

Jeffs Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jeffs Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innoviz Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jeffs Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innoviz Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jeffs Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innoviz Technologies quarterly revenues of $6M. Jeffs Brands's net income of -- is lower than Innoviz Technologies's net income of -$18.6M. Notably, Jeffs Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innoviz Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jeffs Brands is 0.05x versus 5.37x for Innoviz Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mobileye Global has a net margin of -- compared to Jeffs Brands's net margin of -23.29%. Jeffs Brands's return on equity of -73.87% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64%.

Jeffs Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mobileye Global has an analysts' consensus of $18.85 which suggests that it could grow by 15.63%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Jeffs Brands, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Jeffs Brands.

Jeffs Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jeffs Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mobileye Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jeffs Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mobileye Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jeffs Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mobileye Global quarterly revenues of $438M. Jeffs Brands's net income of -- is lower than Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M. Notably, Jeffs Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mobileye Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jeffs Brands is 0.05x versus 7.13x for Mobileye Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REE Automotive has a net margin of -- compared to Jeffs Brands's net margin of -349890.91%. Jeffs Brands's return on equity of -73.87% beat REE Automotive's return on equity of -144.74%.

Jeffs Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REE Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $13.67 which suggests that it could grow by 354.04%. Given that REE Automotive has higher upside potential than Jeffs Brands, analysts believe REE Automotive is more attractive than Jeffs Brands.

Jeffs Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REE Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jeffs Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REE Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jeffs Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REE Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jeffs Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than REE Automotive quarterly revenues of $11K. Jeffs Brands's net income of -- is lower than REE Automotive's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Jeffs Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REE Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jeffs Brands is 0.05x versus 23.54x for REE Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.