MBLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 6.79%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.28, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.357%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $234M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 8.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.86x versus 0.51x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 3.35%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.28, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.86x versus 0.20x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fox Factory Holding has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 1.33%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat Fox Factory Holding's return on equity of 0.89%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.28, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Fox Factory Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.33%. Given that Fox Factory Holding has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Fox Factory Holding is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fox Factory Holding has a beta of 1.598, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.818%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fox Factory Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fox Factory Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are larger than Fox Factory Holding quarterly revenues of $359.1M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than Fox Factory Holding's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fox Factory Holding's PE ratio is 114.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.86x versus 0.91x for Fox Factory Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of --. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.28, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.86x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.