MBLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -14.49% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 3.35%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.53% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $18.98, signalling upside risk potential of 30.92%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 91.33%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $490M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$71M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.09x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -14.49% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -23.71%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.53% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $18.98, signalling upside risk potential of 30.92%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 358.72%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.1%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $490M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$71M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.09x versus 0.05x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -14.49% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of --. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.53% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $18.98, signalling upside risk potential of 30.92%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $490M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Mobileye Global's net income of -$71M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.09x versus 143.72x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of -14.49% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 1.02%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.53% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 7.22%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $18.98, signalling upside risk potential of 30.92%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.74%. Given that Strattec Security has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Strattec Security is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.215%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $490M, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $129.9M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$71M is lower than Strattec Security's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.09x versus 0.27x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.