MBLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of -19.05% compared to Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net margin of 14.64%. Mobileye Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.79% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.07, signalling upside risk potential of 59.47%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Mobileye Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Mobileye Global, Inc. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $504M, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net income of -$96M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Mobileye Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global, Inc. is 5.01x versus 1.21x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REE Automotive Ltd. has a net margin of -19.05% compared to Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net margin of -349890.91%. Mobileye Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.79% beat REE Automotive Ltd.'s return on equity of -144.74%.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.07, signalling upside risk potential of 59.47%. On the other hand REE Automotive Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 146.91%. Given that REE Automotive Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, Inc., analysts believe REE Automotive Ltd. is more attractive than Mobileye Global, Inc..

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REE Automotive Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REE Automotive Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REE Automotive Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $504M, which are larger than REE Automotive Ltd. quarterly revenues of $11K. Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net income of -$96M is lower than REE Automotive Ltd.'s net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Mobileye Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REE Automotive Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global, Inc. is 5.01x versus 68.53x for REE Automotive Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour, Inc. has a net margin of -19.05% compared to Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net margin of -1.4%. Mobileye Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.79% beat Under Armour, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.57%.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.07, signalling upside risk potential of 59.47%. On the other hand Under Armour, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.87 which suggests that it could grow by 26.51%. Given that Mobileye Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Under Armour, Inc., analysts believe Mobileye Global, Inc. is more attractive than Under Armour, Inc..

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour, Inc. has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.67%.

Mobileye Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Under Armour, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $504M, which are smaller than Under Armour, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mobileye Global, Inc.'s net income of -$96M is lower than Under Armour, Inc.'s net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Mobileye Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global, Inc. is 5.01x versus 0.39x for Under Armour, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.