INVZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global E Online has a net margin of -549.91% compared to Innoviz Technologies's net margin of -12.82%. Innoviz Technologies's return on equity of -80.13% beat Global E Online's return on equity of -11.15%.

Innoviz Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.02, signalling upside risk potential of 75.36%. On the other hand Global E Online has an analysts' consensus of $59.46 which suggests that it could grow by 8.55%. Given that Innoviz Technologies has higher upside potential than Global E Online, analysts believe Innoviz Technologies is more attractive than Global E Online.

Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global E Online has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Innoviz Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global E Online offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innoviz Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global E Online pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innoviz Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than Global E Online quarterly revenues of $176M. Innoviz Technologies's net income of -$24.9M is lower than Global E Online's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Innoviz Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global E Online's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innoviz Technologies is 5.77x versus 13.52x for Global E Online. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jeffs Brands has a net margin of -549.91% compared to Innoviz Technologies's net margin of --. Innoviz Technologies's return on equity of -80.13% beat Jeffs Brands's return on equity of -73.87%.

Innoviz Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.02, signalling upside risk potential of 75.36%. On the other hand Jeffs Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innoviz Technologies has higher upside potential than Jeffs Brands, analysts believe Innoviz Technologies is more attractive than Jeffs Brands.

Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jeffs Brands has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Innoviz Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jeffs Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innoviz Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jeffs Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innoviz Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are larger than Jeffs Brands quarterly revenues of --. Innoviz Technologies's net income of -$24.9M is higher than Jeffs Brands's net income of --. Notably, Innoviz Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jeffs Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innoviz Technologies is 5.77x versus 0.02x for Jeffs Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mobileye Global has a net margin of -549.91% compared to Innoviz Technologies's net margin of -558.64%. Innoviz Technologies's return on equity of -80.13% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71%.

Innoviz Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.02, signalling upside risk potential of 75.36%. On the other hand Mobileye Global has an analysts' consensus of $20.28 which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that Innoviz Technologies has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Innoviz Technologies is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Innoviz Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mobileye Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innoviz Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mobileye Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innoviz Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than Mobileye Global quarterly revenues of $486M. Innoviz Technologies's net income of -$24.9M is higher than Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B. Notably, Innoviz Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mobileye Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innoviz Technologies is 5.77x versus 7.86x for Mobileye Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REE Automotive has a net margin of -549.91% compared to Innoviz Technologies's net margin of -349890.91%. Innoviz Technologies's return on equity of -80.13% beat REE Automotive's return on equity of -144.74%.

Innoviz Technologies has a consensus price target of $2.02, signalling upside risk potential of 75.36%. On the other hand REE Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 61.11%. Given that Innoviz Technologies has higher upside potential than REE Automotive, analysts believe Innoviz Technologies is more attractive than REE Automotive.

Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REE Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Innoviz Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REE Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innoviz Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REE Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innoviz Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are larger than REE Automotive quarterly revenues of $11K. Innoviz Technologies's net income of -$24.9M is higher than REE Automotive's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Innoviz Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REE Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innoviz Technologies is 5.77x versus 20.91x for REE Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.