FRSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innoviz Technologies has a net margin of -3069.31% compared to Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net margin of -308.55%. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's return on equity of -96.94% beat Innoviz Technologies's return on equity of -83.58%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.61%. On the other hand Innoviz Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $2.32 which suggests that it could grow by 197.94%. Given that Foresight Autonomous Holdings has higher upside potential than Innoviz Technologies, analysts believe Foresight Autonomous Holdings is more attractive than Innoviz Technologies.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innoviz Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foresight Autonomous Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innoviz Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings quarterly revenues are $101K, which are smaller than Innoviz Technologies quarterly revenues of $6M. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Innoviz Technologies's net income of -$18.6M. Notably, Foresight Autonomous Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innoviz Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foresight Autonomous Holdings is 23.80x versus 5.37x for Innoviz Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jeffs Brands has a net margin of -3069.31% compared to Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net margin of --. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's return on equity of -96.94% beat Jeffs Brands's return on equity of -73.87%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.61%. On the other hand Jeffs Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foresight Autonomous Holdings has higher upside potential than Jeffs Brands, analysts believe Foresight Autonomous Holdings is more attractive than Jeffs Brands.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jeffs Brands has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jeffs Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foresight Autonomous Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jeffs Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings quarterly revenues are $101K, which are larger than Jeffs Brands quarterly revenues of --. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Jeffs Brands's net income of --. Notably, Foresight Autonomous Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jeffs Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foresight Autonomous Holdings is 23.80x versus 0.05x for Jeffs Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mobileye Global has a net margin of -3069.31% compared to Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net margin of -23.29%. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's return on equity of -96.94% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.61%. On the other hand Mobileye Global has an analysts' consensus of $18.85 which suggests that it could grow by 15.63%. Given that Foresight Autonomous Holdings has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Foresight Autonomous Holdings is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mobileye Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foresight Autonomous Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mobileye Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings quarterly revenues are $101K, which are smaller than Mobileye Global quarterly revenues of $438M. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M. Notably, Foresight Autonomous Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mobileye Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foresight Autonomous Holdings is 23.80x versus 7.13x for Mobileye Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REE Automotive has a net margin of -3069.31% compared to Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net margin of -349890.91%. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's return on equity of -96.94% beat REE Automotive's return on equity of -144.74%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.61%. On the other hand REE Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $13.67 which suggests that it could grow by 354.04%. Given that Foresight Autonomous Holdings has higher upside potential than REE Automotive, analysts believe Foresight Autonomous Holdings is more attractive than REE Automotive.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REE Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REE Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foresight Autonomous Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REE Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foresight Autonomous Holdings quarterly revenues are $101K, which are larger than REE Automotive quarterly revenues of $11K. Foresight Autonomous Holdings's net income of -$3.1M is higher than REE Automotive's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Foresight Autonomous Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REE Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foresight Autonomous Holdings is 23.80x versus 23.54x for REE Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.