Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Sell
35
IBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.32
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$22.00 - $22.44
52-week range:
$22.00 - $26.08
Dividend yield:
1.35%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
667
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
$22.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.35% | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
$20.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.96% | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
$34.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.85% | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
$9.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.33% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$101.42 | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 | 0% | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
$10.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.11% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | 1.273 | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | 2.388 | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | 1.626 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.363 | -- | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.028 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or OCEN?
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or OCEN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or OCEN More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or OCEN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. NYLI Clean Oceans ETF offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI Clean Oceans ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or OCEN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for NYLI Clean Oceans ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or QCLN?
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or QCLN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or QCLN More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has a beta of 1.610, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.005%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or QCLN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or QCLN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or RAYS?
Global X Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or RAYS?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Solar ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or RAYS More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Solar ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or RAYS?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Global X Solar ETF offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or RAYS?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or SMOG More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or WNDY?
Global X Wind Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Wind Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- WNDYGlobal X Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or WNDY?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Wind Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Wind Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Wind Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 WNDYGlobal X Wind Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or WNDY More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Wind Energy ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or WNDY?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Global X Wind Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Wind Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or WNDY?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Wind Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Wind Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Wind Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Wind Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- WNDYGlobal X Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.65% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 4.9% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.4% over the past day.
