Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Buy
72
IBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.89
Seasonality move
:
-0.83%
Day range:
$28.93 - $28.98
52-week range:
$18.44 - $32.85
Dividend yield:
1.13%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.8K
Avg. volume:
7.2K
1-year change:
29.88%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
$29.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.13% | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
$33.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.05% | -- |
|
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
|
$33.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$132.19 | -- | -- | -- | $2.03 | 1.54% | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
$70.80 | -- | -- | -- | $5.33 | 0.99% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.346 | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | 3.774 | -- | -- |
|
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 0.650 | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | 1.285 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or HYDR?
Global X Hydrogen ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or HYDR?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Hydrogen ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Hydrogen ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Hydrogen ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or HYDR More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or HYDR?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Global X Hydrogen ETF offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or HYDR?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Hydrogen ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Hydrogen ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or RCTR?
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- RCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or RCTR?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 RCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or RCTR More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or RCTR?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or RCTR?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- RCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or SMOG More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.148%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.03 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or XT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or XT?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or XT More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.647%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or XT?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or XT?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 18.81% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 30
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
