GLRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group Ltd. has a net margin of -2.52% compared to Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net margin of 5.9%. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.28% beat Everest Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.74%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Everest Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $364.73 which suggests that it could grow by 8.48%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has higher upside potential than Everest Group Ltd., analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is more attractive than Everest Group Ltd..

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.113%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group Ltd. offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group Ltd. pays out 24.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175M, which are smaller than Everest Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Everest Group Ltd.'s net income of $255M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Everest Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is 0.73x versus 0.80x for Everest Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -2.52% compared to Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net margin of -26.67%. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.28% beat Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -43.25%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 313.22%. Given that Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re Ltd., analysts believe Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re Ltd..

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.98%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175M, which are larger than Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $645K. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$172K. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is 0.73x versus 3.51x for Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patria Investments Ltd. has a net margin of -2.52% compared to Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net margin of 27.52%. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.28% beat Patria Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.26%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Patria Investments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.57 which suggests that it could grow by 3.83%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has higher upside potential than Patria Investments Ltd., analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is more attractive than Patria Investments Ltd..

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patria Investments Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patria Investments Ltd. offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patria Investments Ltd. pays out 186.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175M, which are larger than Patria Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues of $88M. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Patria Investments Ltd.'s net income of $24.2M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Patria Investments Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is 0.73x versus 6.26x for Patria Investments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has a net margin of -2.52% compared to Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net margin of 4.11%. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.28% beat Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.43%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $240.67 which suggests that it could grow by 16.53%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has higher upside potential than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc., analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is more attractive than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc..

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.451%.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. pays out 32.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175M, which are smaller than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s net income of $255M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re Ltd. is 0.73x versus 0.62x for Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.