Financhill
Sell
40

PAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$13.98
Seasonality move :
-10.57%
Day range:
$13.64 - $14.05
52-week range:
$9.43 - $17.80
Dividend yield:
4.29%
P/E ratio:
44.12x
P/S ratio:
5.78x
P/B ratio:
3.61x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
14.01%
Market cap:
$2.2B
Revenue:
$383.8M
EPS (TTM):
$0.32

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PAX
Patria Investments Ltd.
$97.3M $0.33 12.31% 213.25% $17.29
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$578.5M $8.84 8.49% 259.14% $388.14
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
$1B $0.99 7.62% 207.69% $67.53
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
$1.3B $0.66 -19.01% 57.06% $30.09
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$603.1M $2.79 -33.94% 50.4% $133.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PAX
Patria Investments Ltd.
$14.00 $17.29 $2.2B 44.12x $0.15 4.29% 5.78x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$287.69 $388.14 $8.1B 12.56x $0.01 0.01% 3.97x
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
$28.40 -- $255M 12.85x $0.40 0% 25.80x
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
$53.23 $67.53 $19B 24.32x $0.35 2.63% 4.16x
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
$26.47 $30.09 $11.8B 19.44x $0.21 3.17% 1.85x
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$92.23 $133.00 $4.8B 9.91x $0.30 1.3% 1.17x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PAX
Patria Investments Ltd.
22.05% 1.682 6.91% 0.33x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
45.6% 1.078 29.21% 0.73x
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
-- 0.783 -- 32.32x
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
66.32% 2.428 65.76% 0.47x
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
46.88% 2.056 86.77% 0.31x
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
84.26% 0.633 335.94% 0.04x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PAX
Patria Investments Ltd.
$122.3M $49.3M 11.67% 15.72% 36.68% $50.8M
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$734.7M $309.5M 12.73% 20.05% 38.62% $265.4M
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
-- -- 13.72% 13.72% -- --
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
$1B $500M 5.22% 14.16% 27.13% $516.9M
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
$1.1B -$1.5B -0.74% -1.18% -86.18% $534.6M
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$1.1B $397.4M 2.54% 12.35% 33.58% -$679.3M

Patria Investments Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PAX or AMG?

    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Patria Investments Ltd.'s net margin of 47.18%. Patria Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.72% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    91% -- $813.9M
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    91.68% $11.03 $7.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAX or AMG?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $388.14 which suggests that it could grow by 34.92%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Patria Investments Ltd., analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than Patria Investments Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    2 4 0
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    5 1 0
  • Is PAX or AMG More Risky?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.806%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAX or AMG?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Patria Investments Ltd. pays 110.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments Ltd.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAX or AMG?

    Patria Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are $134.4M, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $801.4M. Patria Investments Ltd.'s net income of $35.6M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $378.1M. Notably, Patria Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.12x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments Ltd. is 5.78x versus 3.97x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    5.78x 44.12x $134.4M $35.6M
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    3.97x 12.56x $801.4M $378.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAX or CFNB?

    California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Patria Investments Ltd.'s net margin of --. Patria Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.72% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    91% -- $813.9M
    CFNB
    California First Leasing Corp.
    -- -- $252.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About PAX or CFNB?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Patria Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Patria Investments Ltd. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    2 4 0
    CFNB
    California First Leasing Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is PAX or CFNB More Risky?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.913%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAX or CFNB?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Patria Investments Ltd. pays 110.72% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAX or CFNB?

    Patria Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are $134.4M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Patria Investments Ltd.'s net income of $35.6M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Patria Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.12x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments Ltd. is 5.78x versus 25.80x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    5.78x 44.12x $134.4M $35.6M
    CFNB
    California First Leasing Corp.
    25.80x 12.85x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PAX or CG?

    The Carlyle Group Inc. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Patria Investments Ltd.'s net margin of 18.75%. Patria Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.72% beat The Carlyle Group Inc.'s return on equity of 14.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    91% -- $813.9M
    CG
    The Carlyle Group Inc.
    55.34% $0.96 $21B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAX or CG?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand The Carlyle Group Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.53 which suggests that it could grow by 26.87%. Given that The Carlyle Group Inc. has higher upside potential than Patria Investments Ltd., analysts believe The Carlyle Group Inc. is more attractive than Patria Investments Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    2 4 0
    CG
    The Carlyle Group Inc.
    7 6 0
  • Is PAX or CG More Risky?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Carlyle Group Inc. has a beta of 2.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.546%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAX or CG?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. The Carlyle Group Inc. offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Patria Investments Ltd. pays 110.72% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group Inc. pays out 64.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments Ltd.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAX or CG?

    Patria Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are $134.4M, which are smaller than The Carlyle Group Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Patria Investments Ltd.'s net income of $35.6M is lower than The Carlyle Group Inc.'s net income of $345.5M. Notably, Patria Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.12x while The Carlyle Group Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments Ltd. is 5.78x versus 4.16x for The Carlyle Group Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    5.78x 44.12x $134.4M $35.6M
    CG
    The Carlyle Group Inc.
    4.16x 24.32x $1.8B $345.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAX or IVZ?

    Invesco Ltd. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Patria Investments Ltd.'s net margin of -58.86%. Patria Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.72% beat Invesco Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    91% -- $813.9M
    IVZ
    Invesco Ltd.
    66.96% -$2.63 $23.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAX or IVZ?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand Invesco Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Patria Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Invesco Ltd., analysts believe Patria Investments Ltd. is more attractive than Invesco Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    2 4 0
    IVZ
    Invesco Ltd.
    4 6 0
  • Is PAX or IVZ More Risky?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ltd. has a beta of 1.688, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.752%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAX or IVZ?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Invesco Ltd. offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Patria Investments Ltd. pays 110.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ltd. pays out 69.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments Ltd.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAX or IVZ?

    Patria Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are $134.4M, which are smaller than Invesco Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Patria Investments Ltd.'s net income of $35.6M is higher than Invesco Ltd.'s net income of -$995.9M. Notably, Patria Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.12x while Invesco Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments Ltd. is 5.78x versus 1.85x for Invesco Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    5.78x 44.12x $134.4M $35.6M
    IVZ
    Invesco Ltd.
    1.85x 19.44x $1.7B -$995.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAX or PFSI?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Patria Investments Ltd.'s net margin of 9.03%. Patria Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.72% beat PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    91% -- $813.9M
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    90.45% $1.97 $27.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAX or PFSI?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $133.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.21%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Patria Investments Ltd., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Patria Investments Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    2 4 0
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
  • Is PAX or PFSI More Risky?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.485%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAX or PFSI?

    Patria Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Patria Investments Ltd. pays 110.72% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays out 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments Ltd.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAX or PFSI?

    Patria Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are $134.4M, which are smaller than PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Patria Investments Ltd.'s net income of $35.6M is lower than PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M. Notably, Patria Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.12x while PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments Ltd. is 5.78x versus 1.17x for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAX
    Patria Investments Ltd.
    5.78x 44.12x $134.4M $35.6M
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.17x 9.91x $1.2B $106.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21

RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.

Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21

JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.

Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21

Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock