PAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 33.56%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.05% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 29.74%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.328%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Patria Investments pays 122.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 41.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments's is not.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $43.6M. Patria Investments's net income of $1.5M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.29x versus 2.84x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 99.99%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.05% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.3%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.493%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Patria Investments pays 122.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments's is not.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Patria Investments's net income of $1.5M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.29x versus 13.52x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 89.54%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.05% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.99%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.614%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Patria Investments pays 122.59% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. Patria Investments's net income of $1.5M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.29x versus 7.23x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 1.92% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of -121.48%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.05% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Patria Investments pays 122.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Patria Investments's net income of $1.5M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.29x versus 21.19x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.