CNDHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 54.03%. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.35% beat Assured Guaranty Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.5%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Assured Guaranty Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.7%. Given that Assured Guaranty Ltd. has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Assured Guaranty Ltd. is more attractive than Conduit Holdings Ltd..

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty Ltd. has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.215%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.5%. Assured Guaranty Ltd. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Conduit Holdings Ltd. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty Ltd. pays out 17.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Assured Guaranty Ltd. quarterly revenues of $211M. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Assured Guaranty Ltd.'s net income of $114M. Notably, Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.92x while Assured Guaranty Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings Ltd. is 0.69x versus 4.99x for Assured Guaranty Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 18.1%. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.35% beat AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.54%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $118.18 which suggests that it could grow by 8.25%. Given that AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings Ltd., analysts believe AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Conduit Holdings Ltd..

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.342%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.5%. AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Conduit Holdings Ltd. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. pays out 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $301.9M. Notably, Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.92x while AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings Ltd. is 0.69x versus 1.41x for AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 5.9%. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.35% beat Everest Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.74%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everest Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $364.73 which suggests that it could grow by 8.48%. Given that Everest Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Everest Group Ltd. is more attractive than Conduit Holdings Ltd..

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.113%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.5%. Everest Group Ltd. offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Conduit Holdings Ltd. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group Ltd. pays out 24.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Everest Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Everest Group Ltd.'s net income of $255M. Notably, Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.92x while Everest Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings Ltd. is 0.69x versus 0.80x for Everest Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 26.75%. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.35% beat Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 27.97%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $29.21 which suggests that it could grow by 3.09%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. is more attractive than Conduit Holdings Ltd..

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.5%. Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings Ltd. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $659.5M. Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $176.4M. Notably, Conduit Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.92x while Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings Ltd. is 0.69x versus 1.08x for Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.