ACGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 22.05% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 11.97%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 29.78% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $423.58 which suggests that it could grow by 14.97%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.831%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 0.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Arch Capital Group's net income of $988M is higher than Everest Group's net income of $509M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 5.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.18x versus 0.99x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 22.05% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 40.78%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 29.78% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.41%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.485%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 0.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $988M is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.18x versus 3.72x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 22.05% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 14.9%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 29.78% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.18%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 0.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $988M is higher than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 4.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.18x versus 0.90x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 22.05% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of -402.57%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 29.78% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Arch Capital Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Arch Capital Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.051%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 0.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $988M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.18x versus 1.56x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.