AXS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 18.6% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 11.84%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 18.91% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 6.63%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.25, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.82%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.553%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $152M. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $293.6M is higher than Assured Guaranty's net income of $18M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.35x versus 5.62x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of 18.6% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of -12.85%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 18.91% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 9.78%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.25, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.88 which suggests that it could grow by 11.7%. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than Everest Group.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $293.6M is higher than Everest Group's net income of -$593M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 11.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.35x versus 0.89x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 18.6% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 45.61%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 18.91% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 9.77%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.25, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.07%. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.851%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $342M. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $293.6M is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $156M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.35x versus 4.15x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 18.6% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of -570.56%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 18.91% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.25, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 76.99%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.628%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Axis Capital Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $293.6M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.70x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.35x versus 1.29x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.