RNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of -8.32% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 11.84%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 11.16% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 6.63%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $276.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.82%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.553%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $152M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of -$189.7M is lower than Assured Guaranty's net income of $18M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.85x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.06x versus 5.62x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of -8.32% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 45.61%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 11.16% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 9.77%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $276.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.07%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.851%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $342M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of -$189.7M is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $156M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.85x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.06x versus 4.15x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hiscox has a net margin of -8.32% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 11.16% beat Hiscox's return on equity of 18.17%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $276.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Hiscox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Hiscox, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Hiscox.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hiscox has a beta of 0.235, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.547%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Hiscox offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hiscox pays out 20.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Hiscox quarterly revenues of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of -$189.7M is higher than Hiscox's net income of --. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.85x while Hiscox's PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.06x versus 1.48x for Hiscox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of -8.32% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of -2.77%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 11.16% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 8%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $276.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.66%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than SiriusPoint, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than SiriusPoint.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.259%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $625.7M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of -$189.7M is lower than SiriusPoint's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.85x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 17.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.06x versus 1.09x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.