FOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 362.96%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 400.215%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 163.41x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors Co. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 2.66%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.46 which suggests that it could fall by -4.19%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.412%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $48.6B. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.44x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solid Power, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -567.26%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Solid Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.25%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand Solid Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.18%. Given that Solid Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Solid Power, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solid Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solid Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solid Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Solid Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Solid Power, Inc.'s net income of -$25.9M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solid Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 35.03x for Solid Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $399.15 which suggests that it could fall by -13.16%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 307.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 16.92x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.