FOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.78%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.07%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.25 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than G-III Apparel Group Ltd., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than G-III Apparel Group Ltd..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.37%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than G-III Apparel Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $613.3M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.43x for G-III Apparel Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -38.63%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 725.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.43x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vince Holding Corp. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 16.47%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Vince Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -35.2%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand Vince Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 51.79%. Given that Vince Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Vince Holding Corp. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vince Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.636%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vince Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vince Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Vince Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $73.2M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Vince Holding Corp.'s net income of $12.1M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vince Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 6.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.12x for Vince Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XCel Brands, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -714.58%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat XCel Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.58%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand XCel Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 431.92%. Given that XCel Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe XCel Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XCel Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.317%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XCel Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XCel Brands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than XCel Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than XCel Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$8M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XCel Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.52x for XCel Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.