FOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of --. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.44%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.03%. Given that Fossil Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Fossil Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Fossil Group has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.07x versus 140.11x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -793.92%. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.44%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $26.67 which suggests that it could grow by 469.8%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Fossil Group.

Fossil Group has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.614%.

Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.07x versus 1.85x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of --. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.44%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fossil Group has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Fossil Group is more attractive than Northann.

Fossil Group has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.07x versus 0.37x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -42.85%. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.44%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 40.26%. Given that Fossil Group has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Fossil Group is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Fossil Group has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.07x versus 2.16x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.