Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
64
FOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.68
Seasonality move
:
4.16%
Day range:
$3.46 - $3.74
52-week range:
$0.86 - $4.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.18x
P/B ratio:
1.85x
Volume:
885.2K
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
108.47%
Market cap:
$208.1M
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
$186.6M | -$0.18 | -27.15% | -86% | $5.00 |
|
ATER
Aterian, Inc.
|
$15.8M | -$0.70 | -25.3% | -7.9% | $8.00 |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
$1.4M | -$0.46 | 6.38% | -76.21% | $5.00 |
|
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
|
$18.8M | -$0.34 | -57.75% | -49.38% | $15.00 |
|
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
|
$3.5M | -$0.17 | -43.95% | -5.99% | $4.00 |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$23.4B | $0.44 | -1.92% | -31.25% | $397.43 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
$3.69 | $5.00 | $208.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
ATER
Aterian, Inc.
|
$0.69 | $8.00 | $6.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.07x |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
$1.12 | $5.00 | $189.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 169.46x |
|
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.60 | $15.00 | $47.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.39x |
|
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
|
$4.69 | $4.00 | $895.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 37.60x |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$481.20 | $397.43 | $1.6T | 321.53x | $0.00 | 0% | 17.72x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
75.1% | 3.033 | 279.12% | 0.86x |
|
ATER
Aterian, Inc.
|
22.6% | -0.309 | 61.68% | 0.64x |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
231.93% | -2.675 | 55.13% | 0.33x |
|
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
|
303.72% | 0.503 | 303.05% | 1.49x |
|
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
|
2.19% | 2.955 | 1.29% | 15.56x |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
14.71% | 2.013 | 0.93% | 1.50x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
$132.4M | -$14.4M | -15.43% | -54.51% | -5.33% | -$22.5M |
|
ATER
Aterian, Inc.
|
$10.7M | -$2M | -35.98% | -45.82% | -10.48% | -$1.6M |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
-$34.2M | -$66.9M | -252.83% | -553.9% | -180889.19% | -$37.1M |
|
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
|
-$8.1M | -$63.9M | -93.65% | -- | -340.86% | -$48.5M |
|
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
|
-$1.6M | -$24.4M | -23.72% | -24.25% | -535.57% | -$14.8M |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$5.1B | $1.9B | 5.99% | 7.04% | 6.63% | $4B |
Fossil Group, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or ATER?
Aterian, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -11.99%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Aterian, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group, Inc.49.01% -$0.76 $435.8M ATERAterian, Inc.56.1% -$0.28 $29.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or ATER?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Aterian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1062.45%. Given that Aterian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Aterian, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0 0 0 ATERAterian, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is FOSL or ATER More Risky?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aterian, Inc. has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.516%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or ATER?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aterian, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aterian, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or ATER?
Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Aterian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Aterian, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aterian, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.07x for Aterian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0.18x -- $270.2M -$40M ATERAterian, Inc.0.07x -- $19M -$2.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or FFAI?
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group, Inc.49.01% -$0.76 $435.8M FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.-92483.78% -$1.55 $97.1M -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or FFAI?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 346.43%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0 0 0 FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is FOSL or FFAI More Risky?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 400.215%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or FFAI?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or FFAI?
Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.18x versus 169.46x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0.18x -- $270.2M -$40M FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.169.46x -- $37K -$222.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or LAZR?
Luminar Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -457.86%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group, Inc.49.01% -$0.76 $435.8M LAZRLuminar Technologies, Inc.-43.1% -$1.29 $148M -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or LAZR?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2381.8%. Given that Luminar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Luminar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0 0 0 LAZRLuminar Technologies, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is FOSL or LAZR More Risky?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.363%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or LAZR?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or LAZR?
Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18.7M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is higher than Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$85.8M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.39x for Luminar Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0.18x -- $270.2M -$40M LAZRLuminar Technologies, Inc.0.39x -- $18.7M -$85.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or SLDP?
Solid Power, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of -567.26%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Solid Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group, Inc.49.01% -$0.76 $435.8M SLDPSolid Power, Inc.-34.01% -$0.14 $390M -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or SLDP?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Solid Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that Solid Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Solid Power, Inc. is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0 0 0 SLDPSolid Power, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FOSL or SLDP More Risky?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solid Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or SLDP?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solid Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solid Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or SLDP?
Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Solid Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Solid Power, Inc.'s net income of -$25.9M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solid Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.18x versus 37.60x for Solid Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0.18x -- $270.2M -$40M SLDPSolid Power, Inc.37.60x -- $4.6M -$25.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group, Inc.49.01% -$0.76 $435.8M TSLATesla, Inc.17.99% $0.39 $94.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or TSLA?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $397.43 which suggests that it could fall by -17.61%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0 0 0 TSLATesla, Inc.15 17 7 -
Is FOSL or TSLA More Risky?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, which suggesting that the stock is 58.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or TSLA?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or TSLA?
Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 321.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.18x versus 17.72x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0.18x -- $270.2M -$40M TSLATesla, Inc.17.72x 321.53x $28.1B $1.4B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
