FOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Hasbro, Inc.'s return on equity of -62.31%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand Hasbro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $93.54 which suggests that it could grow by 4.74%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hasbro, Inc., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than Hasbro, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.055% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.512%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro, Inc. offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc. pays out 76.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Hasbro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Hasbro, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hasbro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.17x versus 2.88x for Hasbro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 16.04%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.4%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand Mattel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.89%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mattel, Inc., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than Mattel, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.055% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.311%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $278.4M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.17x versus 1.31x for Mattel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $415.87 which suggests that it could fall by -4.02%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.055% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 400.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.17x versus 16.01x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon Corp. has a net margin of -14.82% compared to Fossil Group, Inc.'s net margin of 6.43%. Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51% beat Visteon Corp.'s return on equity of 22.73%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand Visteon Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $126.36 which suggests that it could grow by 39.08%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Visteon Corp., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than Visteon Corp..

Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.055% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon Corp. has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.038%.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Visteon Corp. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Fossil Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Visteon Corp. quarterly revenues of $917M. Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M is lower than Visteon Corp.'s net income of $59M. Notably, Fossil Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Visteon Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group, Inc. is 0.17x versus 0.67x for Visteon Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.