EYE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.66%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than National Vision Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. is more attractive than National Vision Holdings, Inc..

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.443% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.187%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.22x versus 0.40x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro, Inc. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Hasbro, Inc.'s return on equity of -62.31%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Hasbro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.87%. Given that Hasbro, Inc. has higher upside potential than National Vision Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Hasbro, Inc. is more attractive than National Vision Holdings, Inc..

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.443% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.879%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro, Inc. offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc. pays out 76.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are smaller than Hasbro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is lower than Hasbro, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hasbro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.22x versus 2.62x for Hasbro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 160.42%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than National Vision Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than National Vision Holdings, Inc..

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.443% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.22x versus 78.55x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann Corp. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -248.19%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Northann Corp.'s return on equity of -204.71%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.90, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Northann Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Vision Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northann Corp., analysts believe National Vision Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Northann Corp..

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.443% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are larger than Northann Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is higher than Northann Corp.'s net income of -$8.8M. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.22x versus 0.31x for Northann Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.