Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
$495.1M | $0.06 | 7.17% | 132.52% | $33.18 |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
$46B | $2.27 | -0.91% | -22.05% | $94.17 |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
$1.8B | $0.55 | -1.01% | -67.89% | $20.45 |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$24.8B | $0.45 | 19.27% | 253.25% | $418.44 |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
$2.5M | -$17.40 | 29.88% | -47.63% | $0.65 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
$28.19 | $33.18 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.17x |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
$0.0068 | -- | $452.3K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
$79.82 | $94.17 | $72.2B | 26.51x | $0.15 | 0.71% | 0.42x |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
$15.80 | $20.45 | $4.9B | 12.58x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.95x |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$428.27 | $418.44 | $1.6T | 398.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.93x |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
$3.95 | $0.65 | $8.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.24x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
44.68% | 3.565 | 29.98% | 0.25x |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
-- | -1.678 | -- | -- |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
68.28% | 0.940 | 174.13% | 0.97x |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
53.8% | 1.349 | 42.16% | 1.61x |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
15.2% | 2.761 | 0.87% | 1.55x |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
62.77% | 5.945 | 230.98% | 0.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
$261.9M | $9.6M | -0.2% | -0.38% | 1.97% | $30.3M |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
-$1.1B | -$3.6B | 1.4% | 4.19% | -8.05% | $390M |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
$812.1M | $160.5M | 8.16% | 17.98% | 9.09% | $796.6M |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$5B | $1.6B | 4.2% | 4.93% | 6.31% | $1.4B |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
-$7.7M | -$16.6M | -88.55% | -181.65% | -694.17% | -$11M |
Elektros, Inc. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Elektros, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
53.75% | $0.04 | $1.6B |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.71%. On the other hand Elektros, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Vision Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Elektros, Inc., analysts believe National Vision Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Elektros, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
8 | 3 | 0 |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elektros, Inc. has a beta of 2.464, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.356%.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elektros, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elektros, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are larger than Elektros, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is higher than Elektros, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elektros, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.17x versus 0.05x for Elektros, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
1.17x | -- | $487.3M | $3.4M |
|
ELEK
Elektros, Inc.
|
0.05x | -- | -- | -- |
General Motors Co. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
53.75% | $0.04 | $1.6B |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
-2.48% | -$3.60 | $194.7B |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.71%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.17 which suggests that it could grow by 17.97%. Given that General Motors Co. has higher upside potential than National Vision Holdings, Inc., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than National Vision Holdings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
8 | 3 | 0 |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
11 | 6 | 1 |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.25%.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 26.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.17x versus 0.42x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
1.17x | -- | $487.3M | $3.4M |
|
GM
General Motors Co.
|
0.42x | 26.51x | $45.3B | -$3.3B |
Mattel, Inc. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.02%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.98%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
53.75% | $0.04 | $1.6B |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
45.97% | $0.34 | $4.8B |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.71%. On the other hand Mattel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.45 which suggests that it could grow by 29.46%. Given that Mattel, Inc. has higher upside potential than National Vision Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mattel, Inc. is more attractive than National Vision Holdings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
8 | 3 | 0 |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
7 | 5 | 0 |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.269%.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are smaller than Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is lower than Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $106.3M. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.17x versus 0.95x for Mattel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
1.17x | -- | $487.3M | $3.4M |
|
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
|
0.95x | 12.58x | $1.8B | $106.3M |
Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
53.75% | $0.04 | $1.6B |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
20.12% | $0.24 | $97.6B |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.71%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $418.44 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that National Vision Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe National Vision Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
8 | 3 | 0 |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
17 | 17 | 6 |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 398.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.17x versus 15.93x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
1.17x | -- | $487.3M | $3.4M |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
15.93x | 398.02x | $24.9B | $856M |
Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of 0.69% compared to National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -328.21%. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.38% beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
53.75% | $0.04 | $1.6B |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
-323.17% | -$6.05 | $86.1M |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.71%. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 97.47%. Given that Workhorse Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than National Vision Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Workhorse Group, Inc. is more attractive than National Vision Holdings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
8 | 3 | 0 |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
0 | 2 | 0 |
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.346%.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Vision Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $487.3M, which are larger than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M is higher than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Vision Holdings, Inc. is 1.17x versus 0.24x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EYE
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
|
1.17x | -- | $487.3M | $3.4M |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
0.24x | -- | $2.4M | -$7.8M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.