EFOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -20.82% compared to Energy Focus, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. Energy Focus, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1718.18%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.3%. Given that Energy Focus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., analysts believe Energy Focus, Inc. is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc..

Energy Focus, Inc. has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.685%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Energy Focus, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Focus, Inc. quarterly revenues are $826K, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Energy Focus, Inc.'s net income of -$172K is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, Energy Focus, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.43x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a net margin of -20.82% compared to Energy Focus, Inc.'s net margin of -4.47%. Energy Focus, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1718.18%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 177.78%. Given that Energy Focus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., analysts believe Energy Focus, Inc. is more attractive than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc..

Energy Focus, Inc. has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.933, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.264%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Focus, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus, Inc. quarterly revenues are $826K, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.5M. Energy Focus, Inc.'s net income of -$172K is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Energy Focus, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.08x for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -20.82% compared to Energy Focus, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Energy Focus, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1718.18%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 174.73%. Given that Energy Focus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings Corp., analysts believe Energy Focus, Inc. is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings Corp..

Energy Focus, Inc. has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.306%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Focus, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus, Inc. quarterly revenues are $826K, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Energy Focus, Inc.'s net income of -$172K is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Energy Focus, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus, Inc. is 3.05x versus 74.46x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann Corp. has a net margin of -20.82% compared to Energy Focus, Inc.'s net margin of -248.19%. Energy Focus, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Northann Corp.'s return on equity of -204.71%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1718.18%. On the other hand Northann Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Focus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northann Corp., analysts believe Energy Focus, Inc. is more attractive than Northann Corp..

Energy Focus, Inc. has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Focus, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Focus, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus, Inc. quarterly revenues are $826K, which are smaller than Northann Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Energy Focus, Inc.'s net income of -$172K is higher than Northann Corp.'s net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Energy Focus, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.25x for Northann Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.