DRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 3.86%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.761%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.24x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.89x versus 0.56x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 6.85%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than RTX.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.687%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. RTX offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.24x while RTX's PE ratio is 38.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.89x versus 2.25x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 4.63%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.22 which suggests that it could fall by -12.59%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.606%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.24x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.89x versus 1.58x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 11.27%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Woodward's return on equity of 16.72%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $205.13 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.346%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Woodward quarterly revenues of $772.7M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Woodward's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.24x while Woodward's PE ratio is 30.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.89x versus 3.37x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.