DRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astronics Corp. has a net margin of 7.5% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of -5.25%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31% beat Astronics Corp.'s return on equity of -1.34%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.30, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand Astronics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $62.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.33%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Astronics Corp., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than Astronics Corp..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astronics Corp. has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.279%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Astronics Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astronics Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $960M, which are larger than Astronics Corp. quarterly revenues of $211.4M. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M is higher than Astronics Corp.'s net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.27x while Astronics Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 2.54x versus 2.34x for Astronics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a net margin of 7.5% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.78%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31% beat CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.26%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.30, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.37%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, Inc., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures, Inc..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.498%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $960M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M is higher than CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.27x while CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 2.54x versus 0.51x for CPI Aerostructures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 7.5% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 6.28%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31% beat Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.30, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand Karman Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.80 which suggests that it could grow by 26.82%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Karman Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays out -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $960M, which are larger than Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M is higher than Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.27x while Karman Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 771.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 2.54x versus 20.41x for Karman Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX Corp. has a net margin of 7.5% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 8.92%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31% beat RTX Corp.'s return on equity of 10.85%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.30, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand RTX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $193.79 which suggests that it could grow by 15.04%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than RTX Corp., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than RTX Corp..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX Corp. has a beta of 0.439, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.146%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. RTX Corp. offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp. pays out 69.8% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $960M, which are smaller than RTX Corp. quarterly revenues of $22.5B. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M is lower than RTX Corp.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.27x while RTX Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 2.54x versus 2.65x for RTX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.