DRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.78%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.26%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.36%. Given that CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, Inc., analysts believe CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is more attractive than Leonardo DRS, Inc..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.108%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $102M is higher than CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.16x while CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 3.44x versus 0.66x for CPI Aerostructures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.74%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.24%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand Karman Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $117.10 which suggests that it could grow by 36.43%. Given that Karman Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, Inc., analysts believe Karman Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Leonardo DRS, Inc..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Karman Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $102M is higher than Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.7M. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.16x while Karman Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 654.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 3.44x versus 24.08x for Karman Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX Corp. has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 7.07%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat RTX Corp.'s return on equity of 10.94%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand RTX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $216.34 which suggests that it could grow by 10.03%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than RTX Corp., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than RTX Corp..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX Corp. has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.766%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. RTX Corp. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp. pays out 53.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than RTX Corp. quarterly revenues of $24.2B. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $102M is lower than RTX Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.16x while RTX Corp.'s PE ratio is 39.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 3.44x versus 3.03x for RTX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward, Inc. has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net margin of 13.42%. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.08%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand Woodward, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.33%. Given that Woodward, Inc. has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, Inc., analysts believe Woodward, Inc. is more attractive than Leonardo DRS, Inc..

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.531%.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Woodward, Inc. offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc. pays out 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.5M. Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $102M is lower than Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $133.7M. Notably, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.16x while Woodward, Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS, Inc. is 3.44x versus 5.98x for Woodward, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.