KRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.78%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.26%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.29, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.59%. Given that CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.498%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is higher than CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 944.04x while CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 24.96x versus 0.65x for CPI Aerostructures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.5%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.29, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.90 which suggests that it could grow by 35.86%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.161%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS, Inc. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $960M. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 944.04x while Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 24.96x versus 2.60x for Leonardo DRS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.7%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 66.18%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.29, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $523.95 which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that Lockheed Martin Corp. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Lockheed Martin Corp. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.085%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 57.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 944.04x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 24.96x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX Corp. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.92%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat RTX Corp.'s return on equity of 10.85%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.29, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand RTX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $195.95 which suggests that it could grow by 5.14%. Given that RTX Corp. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe RTX Corp. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX Corp. has a beta of 0.439, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.146%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX Corp. offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp. pays out 69.8% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than RTX Corp. quarterly revenues of $22.5B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than RTX Corp.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 944.04x while RTX Corp.'s PE ratio is 38.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 24.96x versus 2.93x for RTX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.