KRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.5%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.89, signalling upside risk potential of 37.09%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that Karman Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, Inc., analysts believe Karman Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Leonardo DRS, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.147%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS, Inc. offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $960M. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 953.50x while Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 25.21x versus 3.01x for Leonardo DRS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.16%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.3%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.89, signalling upside risk potential of 37.09%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $278.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.81%. Given that Karman Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, Inc., analysts believe Karman Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.192%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. pays out 11.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s net income of $372M. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 953.50x while Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 69.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 25.21x versus 12.68x for Howmet Aerospace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.61%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 80.27%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.89, signalling upside risk potential of 37.09%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $657.58 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that Karman Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin Corp., analysts believe Karman Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lockheed Martin Corp..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.228, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.215%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 62.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 953.50x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 25.21x versus 2.05x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX Corp. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.07%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat RTX Corp.'s return on equity of 10.94%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.89, signalling upside risk potential of 37.09%. On the other hand RTX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $215.02 which suggests that it could grow by 4.93%. Given that Karman Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than RTX Corp., analysts believe Karman Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than RTX Corp..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX Corp. has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.172%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX Corp. offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp. pays out 53.8% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than RTX Corp. quarterly revenues of $24.2B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than RTX Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 953.50x while RTX Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 25.21x versus 3.14x for RTX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.