KRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.5%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.22, signalling downside risk potential of -3.93%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.10 which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.939%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS, Inc. offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $960M. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,303.86x while Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 34.47x versus 3.11x for Leonardo DRS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 18.43%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.17%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.22, signalling downside risk potential of -3.93%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Howmet Aerospace, Inc. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.245%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. pays out 9.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s net income of $385M. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,303.86x while Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 61.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 34.47x versus 11.10x for Howmet Aerospace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.7%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 66.18%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.22, signalling downside risk potential of -3.93%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $569.68 which suggests that it could fall by -4.08%. Given that Lockheed Martin Corp. has more downside risk than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Karman Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lockheed Martin Corp..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.243, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.733%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 57.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,303.86x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 34.47x versus 1.90x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX Corp. has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.92%. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.56% beat RTX Corp.'s return on equity of 10.85%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.22, signalling downside risk potential of -3.93%. On the other hand RTX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $202.83 which suggests that it could grow by 3.31%. Given that RTX Corp. has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, Inc., analysts believe RTX Corp. is more attractive than Karman Holdings, Inc..

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX Corp. has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.732%.

Karman Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX Corp. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Karman Holdings, Inc. pays -1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp. pays out 69.8% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are smaller than RTX Corp. quarterly revenues of $22.5B. Karman Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.6M is lower than RTX Corp.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Karman Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,303.86x while RTX Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings, Inc. is 34.47x versus 3.09x for RTX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.