CYRX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a net margin of -15.14% compared to CryoPort, Inc.'s net margin of -6.18%. CryoPort, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.32% beat Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.04%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.22, signalling upside risk potential of 56.66%. On the other hand Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.31%. Given that CryoPort, Inc. has higher upside potential than Covenant Logistics Group, Inc., analysts believe CryoPort, Inc. is more attractive than Covenant Logistics Group, Inc..

CryoPort, Inc. has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.243% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.486%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CryoPort, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. pays out 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

CryoPort, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $295.4M. CryoPort, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is higher than Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net income of -$18.3M. Notably, CryoPort, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 138.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CryoPort, Inc. is 2.22x versus 0.67x for Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heartland Express, Inc. has a net margin of -15.14% compared to CryoPort, Inc.'s net margin of -10.84%. CryoPort, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.32% beat Heartland Express, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.64%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.22, signalling upside risk potential of 56.66%. On the other hand Heartland Express, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.80 which suggests that it could fall by -16.67%. Given that CryoPort, Inc. has higher upside potential than Heartland Express, Inc., analysts believe CryoPort, Inc. is more attractive than Heartland Express, Inc..

CryoPort, Inc. has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.243% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Express, Inc. has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.664%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heartland Express, Inc. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. CryoPort, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Express, Inc. pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Express, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CryoPort, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Heartland Express, Inc. quarterly revenues of $179.4M. CryoPort, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is higher than Heartland Express, Inc.'s net income of -$19.4M. Notably, CryoPort, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Heartland Express, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CryoPort, Inc. is 2.22x versus 1.14x for Heartland Express, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -15.14% compared to CryoPort, Inc.'s net margin of -0.37%. CryoPort, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.32% beat Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.92%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.22, signalling upside risk potential of 56.66%. On the other hand Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.11 which suggests that it could grow by 2.28%. Given that CryoPort, Inc. has higher upside potential than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., analysts believe CryoPort, Inc. is more attractive than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc..

CryoPort, Inc. has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.243% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.174%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. CryoPort, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. pays out 177.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

CryoPort, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. CryoPort, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is higher than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$6.9M. Notably, CryoPort, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 152.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CryoPort, Inc. is 2.22x versus 1.34x for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a net margin of -15.14% compared to CryoPort, Inc.'s net margin of 1.76%. CryoPort, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.32% beat Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.27%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.22, signalling upside risk potential of 56.66%. On the other hand Marten Transport Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.72%. Given that CryoPort, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marten Transport Ltd., analysts believe CryoPort, Inc. is more attractive than Marten Transport Ltd..

CryoPort, Inc. has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.243% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.776%.

CryoPort, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marten Transport Ltd. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CryoPort, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport Ltd. pays out 114.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

CryoPort, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues of $210.1M. CryoPort, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, CryoPort, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Marten Transport Ltd.'s PE ratio is 64.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CryoPort, Inc. is 2.22x versus 1.28x for Marten Transport Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.