CVLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System, Inc. has a net margin of 2.11% compared to Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.61%. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.79% beat Landstar System, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.51%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.67, signalling upside risk potential of 37.16%. On the other hand Landstar System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $131.07 which suggests that it could fall by -6.88%. Given that Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Landstar System, Inc., analysts believe Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is more attractive than Landstar System, Inc..

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.934%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Landstar System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. pays 16.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $296.9M, which are smaller than Landstar System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net income of $6.3M is lower than Landstar System, Inc.'s net income of $19.4M. Notably, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Landstar System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is 0.52x versus 1.03x for Landstar System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a net margin of 2.11% compared to Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.01%. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.79% beat Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.52%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.67, signalling upside risk potential of 37.16%. On the other hand Marten Transport Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.7%. Given that Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marten Transport Ltd., analysts believe Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marten Transport Ltd..

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.628%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Marten Transport Ltd. offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. pays 16.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport Ltd. pays out 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $296.9M, which are larger than Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues of $220.5M. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net income of $6.3M is higher than Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Marten Transport Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is 0.52x versus 1.01x for Marten Transport Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a net margin of 2.11% compared to Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net margin of 19.26%. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.79% beat Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 25%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.67, signalling upside risk potential of 37.16%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $155.46 which suggests that it could grow by 1.27%. Given that Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., analysts believe Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc..

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.184%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. pays 16.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $296.9M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net income of $6.3M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s net income of $270.9M. Notably, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is 0.52x versus 5.86x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.11% compared to Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net margin of -18.84%. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.79% beat Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.67, signalling upside risk potential of 37.16%. On the other hand Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc..

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.741%.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. pays 16.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays out 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $296.9M, which are smaller than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $396.8M. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s net income of $6.3M is higher than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M. Notably, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is 0.52x versus 0.26x for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.