CTRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lands' End has a net margin of -3.99% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of -0.19%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37% beat Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.94%. On the other hand Lands' End has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.37%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Citi Trends.

Citi Trends has a beta of 2.366, which suggesting that the stock is 136.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lands' End has a beta of 2.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.865%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lands' End offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lands' End pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $179.1M, which are smaller than Lands' End quarterly revenues of $318.6M. Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Lands' End's net income of -$593K. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lands' End's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.28x versus 0.29x for Lands' End. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of -3.99% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of 9.64%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.94%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $161.73 which suggests that it could grow by 13.3%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Citi Trends.

Citi Trends has a beta of 2.366, which suggesting that the stock is 136.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.501%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $179.1M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 23.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.28x versus 2.34x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -3.99% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of 7.56%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.94%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.9%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Citi Trends has a beta of 2.366, which suggesting that the stock is 136.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $179.1M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.28x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zumiez has a net margin of -3.99% compared to Citi Trends's net margin of 0.52%. Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37% beat Zumiez's return on equity of -14.63%.

Citi Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.94%. On the other hand Zumiez has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.82%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Citi Trends.

Citi Trends has a beta of 2.366, which suggesting that the stock is 136.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zumiez has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.448%.

Citi Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zumiez offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citi Trends pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zumiez pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citi Trends quarterly revenues are $179.1M, which are smaller than Zumiez quarterly revenues of $222.5M. Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Zumiez's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Citi Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zumiez's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citi Trends is 0.28x versus 0.41x for Zumiez. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.