Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
$202.5M | $0.03 | -3.27% | -51.51% | $3.63 |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
$42M | -- | -11.89% | -- | $2.61 |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
$529.6M | $0.92 | 5.4% | 1.48% | $92.00 |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
$22M | $0.15 | 12.47% | 141.27% | $67.50 |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
$536.9M | $0.68 | -2.53% | 68.82% | $17.85 |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
$50.3M | $0.19 | -26.06% | -- | $4.33 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
$4.96 | $3.63 | $1.1B | 13.16x | $0.10 | 4.03% | 1.49x |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
$0.86 | $2.61 | $92.5M | 11.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.51x |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
$86.50 | $92.00 | $2.3B | 19.47x | $0.25 | 0.58% | 1.02x |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
$53.30 | $67.50 | $744.7M | 69.19x | $0.30 | 0% | 8.95x |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
$18.10 | $17.85 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.52x |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
$1.58 | $4.33 | $45.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
3.37% | 1.731 | 0.94% | 1.59x |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
32.53% | -0.339 | 13.48% | 2.38x |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
-- | 1.299 | -- | 1.72x |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
2.74% | 1.272 | 0.39% | 8.10x |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
14.37% | 2.650 | 3.14% | 1.02x |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
114.9% | 0.937 | 532.14% | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
$94.1M | $22.7M | 18.66% | 19.25% | 13.29% | $13.9M |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
$37M | $2M | 7.82% | 9.65% | 4.65% | $3.6M |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
$155.3M | $48.8M | 11.27% | 11.57% | 8.02% | -$35.8M |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
$16.8M | $4.6M | 11.67% | 11.97% | 19.82% | $7.3M |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
$125.7M | -$24.1M | -13.02% | -15.02% | -8.37% | -$2.3M |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
$32.5M | $6.1M | -11.9% | -41.93% | 12.13% | $6.7M |
WM Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 8.63%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat WM Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.65%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
55.21% | $0.10 | $370.9M |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
87.7% | $0.02 | $162.8M |
Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.63, signalling downside risk potential of -26.92%. On the other hand WM Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.61 which suggests that it could grow by 204.52%. Given that WM Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe WM Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 3 |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WM Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.717%.
Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. WM Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. WM Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are larger than WM Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is higher than WM Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while WM Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.49x versus 0.51x for WM Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
1.49x | 13.16x | $170.4M | $20.5M |
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
0.51x | 11.43x | $42.2M | $3.6M |
ePlus, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 6.27%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat ePlus, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
55.21% | $0.10 | $370.9M |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
25.51% | $1.32 | $1B |
Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.63, signalling downside risk potential of -26.92%. On the other hand ePlus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.36%. Given that ePlus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe ePlus, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 3 |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.55%.
Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. ePlus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than ePlus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $608.8M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is lower than ePlus, Inc.'s net income of $38.2M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while ePlus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.49x versus 1.02x for ePlus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
1.49x | 13.16x | $170.4M | $20.5M |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
1.02x | 19.47x | $608.8M | $38.2M |
Red Violet, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 18.25%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat Red Violet, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.97%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
55.21% | $0.10 | $370.9M |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
72.59% | $0.29 | $104.6M |
Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.63, signalling downside risk potential of -26.92%. On the other hand Red Violet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.52%. Given that Red Violet, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe Red Violet, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 3 |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
2 | 0 | 0 |
Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet, Inc. has a beta of 1.688, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.755%.
Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Red Violet, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are larger than Red Violet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.1M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is higher than Red Violet, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Red Violet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 69.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.49x versus 8.95x for Red Violet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
1.49x | 13.16x | $170.4M | $20.5M |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
8.95x | 69.19x | $23.1M | $4.2M |
Sonos, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of -13.15%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat Sonos, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.02%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
55.21% | $0.10 | $370.9M |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
43.68% | -$0.31 | $414.8M |
Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.63, signalling downside risk potential of -26.92%. On the other hand Sonos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.85 which suggests that it could fall by -1.38%. Given that Cricut, Inc. has more downside risk than Sonos, Inc., analysts believe Sonos, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 3 |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
2 | 1 | 1 |
Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonos, Inc. has a beta of 2.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.07%.
Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Sonos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Sonos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $287.9M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is higher than Sonos, Inc.'s net income of -$37.9M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Sonos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.49x versus 1.52x for Sonos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
1.49x | 13.16x | $170.4M | $20.5M |
|
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
|
1.52x | -- | $287.9M | -$37.9M |
Upland Software, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat Upland Software, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.93%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
55.21% | $0.10 | $370.9M |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
64.31% | -$0.09 | $317.1M |
Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.63, signalling downside risk potential of -26.92%. On the other hand Upland Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 174.26%. Given that Upland Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe Upland Software, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 3 |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
2 | 0 | 0 |
Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software, Inc. has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.609%.
Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Upland Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are larger than Upland Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is higher than Upland Software, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Upland Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.49x versus 0.19x for Upland Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
|
1.49x | 13.16x | $170.4M | $20.5M |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
0.19x | -- | $50.5M | -$1.1M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.