CRCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Cricut's net margin of 4.72%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.68% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling downside risk potential of -6.25%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.67%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.524%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 175.03% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $209.3M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Cricut's net income of $11.9M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while ePlus's PE ratio is 15.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.33x versus 0.77x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Cricut's net margin of 4.41%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.68% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling downside risk potential of -6.25%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.39%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.262%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Cricut pays 175.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $209.3M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Cricut's net income of $11.9M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 73.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.33x versus 6.99x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonos has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Cricut's net margin of 9.12%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.68% beat Sonos's return on equity of -14.05%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling downside risk potential of -6.25%. On the other hand Sonos has an analysts' consensus of $13.46 which suggests that it could grow by 54.18%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonos has a beta of 2.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.737%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Sonos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 175.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $209.3M, which are smaller than Sonos quarterly revenues of $550.9M. Cricut's net income of $11.9M is lower than Sonos's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Sonos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.33x versus 0.75x for Sonos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Cricut's net margin of -5.04%. Cricut's return on equity of 12.68% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

Cricut has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling downside risk potential of -6.25%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 93.18%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Cricut.

Cricut has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.848%.

Cricut has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut pays 175.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cricut quarterly revenues are $209.3M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. Cricut's net income of $11.9M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Cricut's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut is 1.33x versus 0.22x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.