CRCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ServiceNow, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 11.24%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat ServiceNow, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.91%.

Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -25.37%. On the other hand ServiceNow, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $188.70 which suggests that it could grow by 76.23%. Given that ServiceNow, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe ServiceNow, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..

Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ServiceNow, Inc. has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.579%.

Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. ServiceNow, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. ServiceNow, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than ServiceNow, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is lower than ServiceNow, Inc.'s net income of $401M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while ServiceNow, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.41x versus 6.76x for ServiceNow, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paid, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 0.59%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat Paid, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.52%.

Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -25.37%. On the other hand Paid, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cricut, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paid, Inc., analysts believe Cricut, Inc. is more attractive than Paid, Inc..

Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paid, Inc. has a beta of 0.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.578%.

Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. Paid, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Paid, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are larger than Paid, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is higher than Paid, Inc.'s net income of $32.2K. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while Paid, Inc.'s PE ratio is 86.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.41x versus 1.14x for Paid, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 5.43%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat ePlus, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.22%.

Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -25.37%. On the other hand ePlus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.22%. Given that ePlus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe ePlus, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..

Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus, Inc. has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69699999999999%.

Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. ePlus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than ePlus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $614.8M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is lower than ePlus, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while ePlus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.41x versus 0.94x for ePlus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonos, Inc. has a net margin of 12.04% compared to Cricut, Inc.'s net margin of 17.19%. Cricut, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.25% beat Sonos, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.29%.

Cricut, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -25.37%. On the other hand Sonos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24.92%. Given that Sonos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cricut, Inc., analysts believe Sonos, Inc. is more attractive than Cricut, Inc..

Cricut, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonos, Inc. has a beta of 2.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.946%.

Cricut, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.26%. Sonos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cricut, Inc. pays 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cricut, Inc. quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Sonos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $545.7M. Cricut, Inc.'s net income of $20.5M is lower than Sonos, Inc.'s net income of $93.8M. Notably, Cricut, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while Sonos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cricut, Inc. is 1.41x versus 1.31x for Sonos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.