SONO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avnet has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Sonos's net margin of 1.54%. Sonos's return on equity of -14.05% beat Avnet's return on equity of 6.4%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $13.46, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand Avnet has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than Avnet, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than Avnet.

Sonos has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avnet has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.993%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avnet offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $550.9M, which are smaller than Avnet quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Sonos's net income of $50.2M is lower than Avnet's net income of $87.3M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Avnet's PE ratio is 12.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 0.68x versus 0.18x for Avnet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cricut has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Sonos's net margin of 5.7%. Sonos's return on equity of -14.05% beat Cricut's return on equity of 12.68%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $13.46, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand Cricut has an analysts' consensus of $4.59 which suggests that it could fall by -6.19%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than Cricut, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than Cricut.

Sonos has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cricut has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cricut offers a yield of 4.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cricut pays out 175.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $550.9M, which are larger than Cricut quarterly revenues of $209.3M. Sonos's net income of $50.2M is higher than Cricut's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cricut's PE ratio is 16.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 0.68x versus 1.49x for Cricut. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GoPro has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Sonos's net margin of -18.51%. Sonos's return on equity of -14.05% beat GoPro's return on equity of -166.14%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $13.46, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 31.15%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than GoPro.

Sonos has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.856%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $550.9M, which are larger than GoPro quarterly revenues of $200.9M. Sonos's net income of $50.2M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 0.68x versus 0.09x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PagerDuty has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Sonos's net margin of -7.21%. Sonos's return on equity of -14.05% beat PagerDuty's return on equity of -25.94%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $13.46, signalling upside risk potential of 68.25%. On the other hand PagerDuty has an analysts' consensus of $20.20 which suggests that it could grow by 30.58%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than PagerDuty, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than PagerDuty.

Sonos has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagerDuty has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.806%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagerDuty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagerDuty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $550.9M, which are larger than PagerDuty quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Sonos's net income of $50.2M is higher than PagerDuty's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PagerDuty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 0.68x versus 3.04x for PagerDuty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.