MAPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 4.93% compared to WM Technology's net margin of 24.04%. WM Technology's return on equity of 6.89% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 123.08%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.65%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WM Technology's is not.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. WM Technology's net income of $2.4M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.62x versus 6.60x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 4.93% compared to WM Technology's net margin of 18.49%. WM Technology's return on equity of 6.89% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 123.08%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $320.15 which suggests that it could grow by 10.54%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Autodesk.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. WM Technology's net income of $2.4M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 56.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.62x versus 10.25x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 4.93% compared to WM Technology's net margin of 0.54%. WM Technology's return on equity of 6.89% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 123.08%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 254.61%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than WM Technology, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than WM Technology.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. WM Technology's net income of $2.4M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.62x versus 0.66x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaltura has a net margin of 4.93% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -14.48%. WM Technology's return on equity of 6.89% beat Kaltura's return on equity of -122.84%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 123.08%. On the other hand Kaltura has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.62%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Kaltura, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Kaltura.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaltura has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaltura offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaltura pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are larger than Kaltura quarterly revenues of $45.6M. WM Technology's net income of $2.4M is higher than Kaltura's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.71x while Kaltura's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.62x versus 1.80x for Kaltura. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.