Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
48
MAPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.83
Seasonality move
:
5.14%
Day range:
$0.79 - $0.83
52-week range:
$0.72 - $1.53
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
11.00x
P/S ratio:
0.49x
P/B ratio:
1.56x
Volume:
2.7M
Avg. volume:
1.6M
1-year change:
-40.21%
Market cap:
$89M
Revenue:
$184.5M
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
$42M | -- | -11.89% | -- | $2.61 |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
$90.2M | $0.07 | 3.67% | -- | $7.14 |
|
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.
|
$35.5M | $0.05 | -4.08% | -- | $2.83 |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
$27.3M | -$0.20 | 4.41% | -1269.86% | $10.88 |
|
KLTR
Kaltura, Inc.
|
$45.4M | $0.01 | -0.57% | -79.34% | $3.50 |
|
SMRT
SmartRent, Inc.
|
$34.7M | -$0.02 | -1.81% | -65.22% | $1.60 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
$0.83 | $2.61 | $89M | 11.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.49x |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
$4.12 | $7.14 | $334.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.96x |
|
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.
|
$1.51 | $2.83 | $140.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.96x |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
$2.48 | $10.88 | $35.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.97x |
|
KLTR
Kaltura, Inc.
|
$1.64 | $3.50 | $232.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.39x |
|
SMRT
SmartRent, Inc.
|
$2.02 | $1.60 | $382.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.57x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
32.53% | -0.339 | 13.48% | 2.38x |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
79.48% | 1.003 | 40.91% | 1.90x |
|
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.
|
4.19% | 0.454 | 3.44% | 2.06x |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
28.68% | 1.541 | 8.28% | 0.71x |
|
KLTR
Kaltura, Inc.
|
72.93% | 0.431 | 21.34% | 0.95x |
|
SMRT
SmartRent, Inc.
|
2.54% | 0.508 | 2.29% | 2.13x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
|
$37M | $2M | 7.82% | 9.65% | 4.65% | $3.6M |
|
CMRC
Commerce.com, Inc.
|
$65.5M | -$352K | -5.95% | -36.72% | -0.41% | $7.6M |
|
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.
|
$17.1M | -$2.3M | -11.43% | -11.98% | -6.44% | $3.1M |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
$13.4M | -$1.7M | -31.18% | -35.27% | -7.4% | -$2M |
|
KLTR
Kaltura, Inc.
|
$30.6M | -$1.9M | -25.71% | -85.49% | -4.3% | $9.2M |
|
SMRT
SmartRent, Inc.
|
$9.6M | -$9.5M | -25.4% | -26.07% | -26.22% | -$3.2M |
WM Technology, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MAPS or CMRC?
Commerce.com, Inc. has a net margin of 8.63% compared to WM Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -2.61%. WM Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.65% beat Commerce.com, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAPSWM Technology, Inc.87.7% $0.02 $162.8M CMRCCommerce.com, Inc.76.18% -$0.03 $208.7M -
What do Analysts Say About MAPS or CMRC?
WM Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 216.33%. On the other hand Commerce.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.14 which suggests that it could grow by 73.37%. Given that WM Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Commerce.com, Inc., analysts believe WM Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Commerce.com, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAPSWM Technology, Inc.1 0 0 CMRCCommerce.com, Inc.1 6 0 -
Is MAPS or CMRC More Risky?
WM Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commerce.com, Inc. has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAPS or CMRC?
WM Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commerce.com, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commerce.com, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAPS or CMRC?
WM Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $42.2M, which are smaller than Commerce.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $86M. WM Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M is higher than Commerce.com, Inc.'s net income of -$2.2M. Notably, WM Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while Commerce.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 0.96x for Commerce.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAPSWM Technology, Inc.0.49x 11.00x $42.2M $3.6M CMRCCommerce.com, Inc.0.96x -- $86M -$2.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns MAPS or EXFY?
Expensify, Inc. has a net margin of 8.63% compared to WM Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -6.6%. WM Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.65% beat Expensify, Inc.'s return on equity of -11.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAPSWM Technology, Inc.87.7% $0.02 $162.8M EXFYExpensify, Inc.48.62% -$0.03 $141.6M -
What do Analysts Say About MAPS or EXFY?
WM Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 216.33%. On the other hand Expensify, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.83 which suggests that it could grow by 87.64%. Given that WM Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Expensify, Inc., analysts believe WM Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Expensify, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAPSWM Technology, Inc.1 0 0 EXFYExpensify, Inc.1 3 0 -
Is MAPS or EXFY More Risky?
WM Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expensify, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAPS or EXFY?
WM Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expensify, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expensify, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAPS or EXFY?
WM Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $42.2M, which are larger than Expensify, Inc. quarterly revenues of $35.1M. WM Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M is higher than Expensify, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, WM Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while Expensify, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 0.96x for Expensify, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAPSWM Technology, Inc.0.49x 11.00x $42.2M $3.6M EXFYExpensify, Inc.0.96x -- $35.1M -$2.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MAPS or INUV?
Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of 8.63% compared to WM Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -7.71%. WM Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.65% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAPSWM Technology, Inc.87.7% $0.02 $162.8M INUVInuvo, Inc.59.47% -$0.12 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About MAPS or INUV?
WM Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 216.33%. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 338.51%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than WM Technology, Inc., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than WM Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAPSWM Technology, Inc.1 0 0 INUVInuvo, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is MAPS or INUV More Risky?
WM Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.024%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAPS or INUV?
WM Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAPS or INUV?
WM Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $42.2M, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. WM Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M is higher than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, WM Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 1.97x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAPSWM Technology, Inc.0.49x 11.00x $42.2M $3.6M INUVInuvo, Inc.1.97x -- $22.6M -$1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MAPS or KLTR?
Kaltura, Inc. has a net margin of 8.63% compared to WM Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -5.99%. WM Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.65% beat Kaltura, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAPSWM Technology, Inc.87.7% $0.02 $162.8M KLTRKaltura, Inc.69.73% -$0.02 $65.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MAPS or KLTR?
WM Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 216.33%. On the other hand Kaltura, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 113.42%. Given that WM Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaltura, Inc., analysts believe WM Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Kaltura, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAPSWM Technology, Inc.1 0 0 KLTRKaltura, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is MAPS or KLTR More Risky?
WM Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaltura, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAPS or KLTR?
WM Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaltura, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaltura, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAPS or KLTR?
WM Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $42.2M, which are smaller than Kaltura, Inc. quarterly revenues of $43.9M. WM Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M is higher than Kaltura, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, WM Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while Kaltura, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 1.39x for Kaltura, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAPSWM Technology, Inc.0.49x 11.00x $42.2M $3.6M KLTRKaltura, Inc.1.39x -- $43.9M -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MAPS or SMRT?
SmartRent, Inc. has a net margin of 8.63% compared to WM Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -17.32%. WM Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.65% beat SmartRent, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAPSWM Technology, Inc.87.7% $0.02 $162.8M SMRTSmartRent, Inc.26.43% -$0.03 $240.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MAPS or SMRT?
WM Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 216.33%. On the other hand SmartRent, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.60 which suggests that it could fall by -20.79%. Given that WM Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than SmartRent, Inc., analysts believe WM Technology, Inc. is more attractive than SmartRent, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAPSWM Technology, Inc.1 0 0 SMRTSmartRent, Inc.0 2 0 -
Is MAPS or SMRT More Risky?
WM Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SmartRent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAPS or SMRT?
WM Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SmartRent, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SmartRent, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAPS or SMRT?
WM Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $42.2M, which are larger than SmartRent, Inc. quarterly revenues of $36.2M. WM Technology, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M is higher than SmartRent, Inc.'s net income of -$6.3M. Notably, WM Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while SmartRent, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 2.57x for SmartRent, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAPSWM Technology, Inc.0.49x 11.00x $42.2M $3.6M SMRTSmartRent, Inc.2.57x -- $36.2M -$6.3M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Sell
50
NUTX alert for Jan 1
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 9.81% over the past day.
