CLNN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of -58513.33% compared to Clene, Inc.'s net margin of -3.15%. Clene, Inc.'s return on equity of -4726.49% beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -5.79%.

Clene, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 452.12%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clene, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe Clene, Inc. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

Clene, Inc. has a beta of 0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 21.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.925%.

Clene, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clene, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clene, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15K, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $52M. Clene, Inc.'s net income of -$8.8M is lower than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Clene, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clene, Inc. is 247.53x versus 0.31x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a net margin of -58513.33% compared to Clene, Inc.'s net margin of -5.61%. Clene, Inc.'s return on equity of -4726.49% beat The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -78.55%.

Clene, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 452.12%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.41 which suggests that it could grow by 134.35%. Given that Clene, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., analysts believe Clene, Inc. is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc..

Clene, Inc. has a beta of 0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 21.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.35%.

Clene, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clene, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clene, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15K, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $367.9M. Clene, Inc.'s net income of -$8.8M is higher than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Clene, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clene, Inc. is 247.53x versus 0.06x for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of -58513.33% compared to Clene, Inc.'s net margin of -3.52%. Clene, Inc.'s return on equity of -4726.49% beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Clene, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 452.12%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 244.47%. Given that Clene, Inc. has higher upside potential than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp., analysts believe Clene, Inc. is more attractive than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp..

Clene, Inc. has a beta of 0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 21.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clene, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clene, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clene, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15K, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Clene, Inc.'s net income of -$8.8M is lower than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, Clene, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clene, Inc. is 247.53x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of -58513.33% compared to Clene, Inc.'s net margin of -7.56%. Clene, Inc.'s return on equity of -4726.49% beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

Clene, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 452.12%. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 307.88%. Given that Clene, Inc. has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, Inc., analysts believe Clene, Inc. is more attractive than Laird Superfood, Inc..

Clene, Inc. has a beta of 0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 21.321% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.079%.

Clene, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clene, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clene, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15K, which are smaller than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Clene, Inc.'s net income of -$8.8M is lower than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, Clene, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clene, Inc. is 247.53x versus 0.51x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.