HAIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of -30.2% compared to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net margin of -8.9%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -98.82% beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -10.85%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.59, signalling upside risk potential of 98.69%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.248, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.817%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384.1M, which are larger than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $75.8M. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$116M is lower than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.29x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz Co. has a net margin of -30.2% compared to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net margin of 10.2%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -98.82% beat The Kraft Heinz Co.'s return on equity of -13.07%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.59, signalling upside risk potential of 98.69%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz Co. has an analysts' consensus of $25.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.12%. Given that The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz Co., analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz Co..

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz Co. has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.571%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz Co. offers a yield of 6.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co. pays out 70.85% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384.1M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz Co. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$116M is lower than The Kraft Heinz Co.'s net income of $648M. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz Co.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 1.17x for The Kraft Heinz Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of -30.2% compared to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net margin of -821.05%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -98.82% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.59, signalling upside risk potential of 98.69%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -1.039, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 203.853%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384.1M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$116M is lower than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 1,022.80x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -30.2% compared to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net margin of 4.34%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -98.82% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.46%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.59, signalling upside risk potential of 98.69%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $85.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.81%. Given that The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc..

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.137%.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384.1M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $677M. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$116M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $29.4M. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.70x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.