HAIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of -25.27% compared to The Hain Celestial Group's net margin of 13.42%. The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -18.79% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 109.9%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 422.19%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group.

The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.171%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Hain Celestial Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues are $411.5M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$104M is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group is 0.16x versus 0.08x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of -25.27% compared to The Hain Celestial Group's net margin of 32.41%. The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -18.79% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 109.9%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.46%. Given that The Hain Celestial Group has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.572%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. The Hain Celestial Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues are $411.5M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$104M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group is 0.16x versus 1.39x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of -25.27% compared to The Hain Celestial Group's net margin of -3.43%. The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -18.79% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 109.9%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 150.97%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group.

The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Hain Celestial Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues are $411.5M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.6M. The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$104M is lower than Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group is 0.16x versus 1.19x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of -25.27% compared to The Hain Celestial Group's net margin of 21.16%. The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -18.79% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 109.9%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $176.69 which suggests that it could grow by 4.88%. Given that The Hain Celestial Group has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

The Hain Celestial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. The Hain Celestial Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues are $411.5M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$104M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, The Hain Celestial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hain Celestial Group is 0.16x versus 4.93x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.