CLBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of -193.8% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of 3.37%. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -521.93% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 5.77%.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $13.64, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cellebrite DI has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe Cellebrite DI is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.002%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $106.9M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Cellebrite DI's net income of -$207.1M is lower than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $23.6M. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 19.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 11.50x versus 0.54x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of -193.8% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of 5.9%. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -521.93% beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96%.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $13.64, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.69%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises has higher upside potential than Cellebrite DI, analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises is more attractive than Cellebrite DI.

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.312%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $106.9M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $143M. Cellebrite DI's net income of -$207.1M is lower than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 11.50x versus 1.09x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of -193.8% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of -539.62%. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -521.93% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $13.64, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 84.43%. Given that SatixFy Communications has higher upside potential than Cellebrite DI, analysts believe SatixFy Communications is more attractive than Cellebrite DI.

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $106.9M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Cellebrite DI's net income of -$207.1M is lower than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 11.50x versus 9.84x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silynxcom has a net margin of -193.8% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of --. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -521.93% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $13.64, signalling upside risk potential of 3.7%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 149.22%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than Cellebrite DI, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than Cellebrite DI.

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $106.9M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Cellebrite DI's net income of -$207.1M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 11.50x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.